2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiment analysis and computational optimization of the Atkinson cycle gasoline engine through NSGA Ⅱ algorithm using machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Figures 8 e,f, the optimal solution has a delayed intake time and an earlier exhaust valve time, which reduces the pumping loss at the operation point of 2800 rpm and 11.42 bar and also reduces the in-cylinder temperature to suppress detonation. 51 , 52 Figure 8 g shows the spark timing for each solution in the Pareto optimal solution set. The spark timing for the optimal solution chosen in the study is −15.9 CAD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Figures 8 e,f, the optimal solution has a delayed intake time and an earlier exhaust valve time, which reduces the pumping loss at the operation point of 2800 rpm and 11.42 bar and also reduces the in-cylinder temperature to suppress detonation. 51 , 52 Figure 8 g shows the spark timing for each solution in the Pareto optimal solution set. The spark timing for the optimal solution chosen in the study is −15.9 CAD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The late closing of the intake valve and early opening of the exhaust valve reduces the pumping loss at the point of operation at 2800 rpm and 11.42 bar, which partially compensates for the adverse effects on fuel economy and power performance because of the retarding spark timing and the use of EGR. Minimizing damage to engine dynamics and economy while suppressing knock is achieved. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiobjective optimization is carried out using the wellknown NSGA-II algorithm (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm) based on non-dominant sorting and crowding� this algorithm follows the general scheme of a genetic algorithm with modified mating and survival selection, which greatly improve the optimization speed and the result. 70 The values for the hyperparameters associated with the multiobjective optimization (NSGA-II) are as follows: population size (PS): 100 individuals, maximum number of generation (MNG): 100, crossover fraction (CF): 0.9, and mutation fraction (MF): 0.5, which are adequate values for problems as complex as the addressed one. It should be noticed that NSGA-II with the 100 individuals and 100 generations selected performs a total of 10,000 evaluations during the optimization process.…”
Section: Mlp Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that different models have different advantages, among which the GPR model had very good generalization ability in scarce data sets. Many researchers use intelligent algorithms to predict engine performance and emission characteristics under different operating conditions 30,31 and use optimization algorithms to find the optimal fuel economy point or Pato boundary 32 with minimum emissions and maximum fuel economy, providing direction for engine calibration, energy conservation, and emission reduction. It can be seen that accurate prediction of engine characteristics plays an important role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%