2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiment and Research of Chemical De-dusting Agent with Spraying Dust-settling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…External spraying is when a spray field forms around a coal mining drum and droplets are then used to capture coal dust particles [6]. Solution properties [7][8][9], nozzle size [10], spray pressure [11], and airflow conditions [12] are important factors in the effectiveness of spray dust reduction, for which scholars have carried out a large number of studies. Zhou et al [13] investigated the effect of spray pressure and nozzle caliber on the atomization of the spray, and the results showed that the atomization effect of the spray was best when the nozzle diameter was 1.5 mm and have carried out a large number of studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External spraying is when a spray field forms around a coal mining drum and droplets are then used to capture coal dust particles [6]. Solution properties [7][8][9], nozzle size [10], spray pressure [11], and airflow conditions [12] are important factors in the effectiveness of spray dust reduction, for which scholars have carried out a large number of studies. Zhou et al [13] investigated the effect of spray pressure and nozzle caliber on the atomization of the spray, and the results showed that the atomization effect of the spray was best when the nozzle diameter was 1.5 mm and have carried out a large number of studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, more and more studies on dust suppressants of today are focused on the control of dust generated by tunnel boring machines on the mining face of coal mines (Wang et al., 2016; Xiao and Zhao, 2015). This type of dust suppressant functions by reformulating surfactants to decrease surface tension of water through synergistic interaction, thus facilitating the moistening of coal powders, but it has the disadvantages of low viscosity, poor solidifying effect, and failure of generating a film (Ding et al., 2016; Naiguo et al., 2014; Zeng et al., 2009). What’s worse, there are a large amount of hydrophobic groups in coal dust which have poor water holding capacity, so a composite dust suppressant cannot solve the issue of fugitive dusts in coal mines with open sources of dust (Gosiewska et al., 2002; Zhu and Wang, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%