2017
DOI: 10.1299/jamdsm.2017jamdsm0053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiment / simulation integrated shape optimization using variable fidelity Kriging model approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…x n m = x n org ± s i stepsize (10) This leads to a matrix of n parameters and m inner steps. In the existing setup with n = 4 and m = 3, the size is 4 3 = 64 values for each outer step.…”
Section: Optimisation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…x n m = x n org ± s i stepsize (10) This leads to a matrix of n parameters and m inner steps. In the existing setup with n = 4 and m = 3, the size is 4 3 = 64 values for each outer step.…”
Section: Optimisation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies with scope to optimise the vertical-axis turbines concentrate mostly on the search for an optimal blade geometry [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Different studies mostly based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with fully automatised simulations [6] coupled with genetic algorithms were carried out [7,8], e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimization problem in this work attempts to minimize the mass of the wind turbine blade while the design variables are the chord and twist distributions. Other wind turbine design based on CFD and surrogate models are demonstrated in [12,13], while some of the other surrogate models used for wind turbine blade optimization in the literature include the KG model [12] and artificial neural networks (ANN) [13].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the POD-based re-parameterization approach is promising for efficient aerodynamic shape optimization while it requires a certain amount of computational cost to construct appropriate input database for POD. In this research, a variable fidelity (VF) concept, which is to utilize multi fidelity functional evaluation methods in an optimization system (Kennedy and O'Hagan, 2000;Alexandrov et al, 2001;Han and Görtz, 2012;Yamazaki and Mavriplis, 2013;Yamazaki, 2017), is introduced in the POD-based approach to further reduce the computational cost of multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimizations. So far, the VF optimization approaches were mostly proposed with advanced VF response surface models and/or sequential approximate optimization systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%