Mössbauer Spectroscopy and Transition Metal Chemistry 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88428-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of a is only slightly larger than the natural linewidth nat = 0.385 mm s −1 [19], as expected. Similarly to what has been found for other metallic systems [17,30], the values of δ and V zz are essentially equal to zero. In terms of the Debye approximation for the lattice vibrations, the absorber Debye-Waller factor f a is expressed [16,17] by the Debye temperature, D , as…”
Section: Mössbauer Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The value of a is only slightly larger than the natural linewidth nat = 0.385 mm s −1 [19], as expected. Similarly to what has been found for other metallic systems [17,30], the values of δ and V zz are essentially equal to zero. In terms of the Debye approximation for the lattice vibrations, the absorber Debye-Waller factor f a is expressed [16,17] by the Debye temperature, D , as…”
Section: Mössbauer Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The 61 Ni ME measurements were conducted using a standard Mössbauer spectrometer operating in sine mode, using the 67.4 keV transition in 61 Ni [16,17]. Both the source and the absorber were in direct contact with liquid helium in a cryostat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In both cases, the quadrupole splitting is larger than in the parent PcFe (which has a small dependency on the solid-state phase of this compound). In the simplistic point-charge model, Mössbauer quadrupole splitting can be calculated as sums of valence and lattice contributions according to eqs and , respectively. , where ⟨ r –3 ⟩ 3d and ⟨ r –3 ⟩ 4p are the expectation values of 1/ r 3 taken over the appropriate 3d and 4p radial functions at the iron atom, respectively. The terms (1 – R ) and (1 – γ ∞ ) are constants, and n is an effective population of the atomic orbitals designated by parentheses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%