2009
DOI: 10.1299/jpes.3.249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Analyses by SIMMER-III on Molten Fuel Freezing and Boiling Pool Behavior

Abstract: This paper describes experimental analyses using the SIMMER-III computer code, which is a two-dimensional multi-component multi-phase Eulerian fluid-dynamics code. Two topics of key phenomena in core disruptive accidents were presented in this paper: molten fuel freezing and dispersion; and boiling behavior of molten fuel pool. Related experimental database are reviewed to select appropriate experiments. To analyze the fuel freezing behavior, the GEYSER out-of-pile and the CABRI-EFM1 in-pile experiments were s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fundamental studies concerning numerical methods are performed to support the code development of COMPASS. The past results of the present project can be found in the references (Koshizuka et al, 2006(Koshizuka et al, , 2007(Koshizuka et al, , 2008a(Koshizuka et al, , 2008b(Koshizuka et al, , 2009a(Koshizuka et al, , 2009b(Koshizuka et al, , 2009cYamano and Tobita, 2009, 2010a, 2010bZhang et al, 2009Zhang et al, , 2010Yamamoto et al, 2008Yamamoto et al, , 2009Shirakawa et al, 2009;Uehara et al, 2009;Himi et al, 2008Himi et al, , 2009.…”
Section: Mps (Moving Particle Semi-implicit) Methods Was Developed To mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fundamental studies concerning numerical methods are performed to support the code development of COMPASS. The past results of the present project can be found in the references (Koshizuka et al, 2006(Koshizuka et al, , 2007(Koshizuka et al, , 2008a(Koshizuka et al, , 2008b(Koshizuka et al, , 2009a(Koshizuka et al, , 2009b(Koshizuka et al, , 2009cYamano and Tobita, 2009, 2010a, 2010bZhang et al, 2009Zhang et al, , 2010Yamamoto et al, 2008Yamamoto et al, , 2009Shirakawa et al, 2009;Uehara et al, 2009;Himi et al, 2008Himi et al, , 2009.…”
Section: Mps (Moving Particle Semi-implicit) Methods Was Developed To mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this paper, recent results of the COMPASS validation study for key phenomena in CDAs of SFRs are summarized, which include melt freezing and blockage formation, low-energy disruptive core motion, molten pool boiling, duct wall failure, and fuel pin failure and disruption. The selected experiments are GEYSER (Berthoud and Duret, 1989), THEFIS (Maschek et al, 1990), CABRI TPA2 (Yamano et al, 2009), SCARABEE BE+3 (Kayser and Stansfield, 1994) and CABRI E7 (Charpenel et al, 2000), respectively.…”
Section: Mps (Moving Particle Semi-implicit) Methods Was Developed To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these viewpoints, this study selected the CABRI-EFM1 experiment, which realized fuel melting after sodium voiding, for the thermal failure mode. (17) This experiment has already been calculated by SIMMER-III, focusing on fuel freezing and blockage behavior (18) , whereas the fuel disruption behavior is emphasized in this study. Of many experiments in the CABRI programs, pure TOP experiments, E5 and E7, were the mechanical failure mode using a large-diameter annular fuel pellet.…”
Section: Fuel-pin Disruption Behaviormentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(25) Figure 3 compares the initial fuel temperature profiles between the SAS4A result, the SIMMER-III detailed pin model, and simple model. The simple pin model, which was used in the previous calculation (18) , calculates fuel temperatures represented only by two radial nodes (interior and outer surface). Although the surface node size is so thin as to obtain good thermal response, the thermal conduction is not well calculated in the interior node.…”
Section: Cabri-efm1 Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comprehensive code assessment study previously mentioned emphasized on the transient multi-phase flow in the transition phase of CDAs within the limitation of the two-dimensional code. Extensive code validation study was also devoted to similar transient multi-phase flows (Yamano and Tobita, 2009, 2010. Unlike these code validation studies, the present study focused on a series of phenomena from the duct wall failure to the fuel relocation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%