2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental analysis of multiple criteria for extractive multi-document text summarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Every text analysis initiates from the text pre-processing and mostly include the dictionary analysis. This step remains intact in many applications of natural language processing [4], [7], [11]. Assessing the existence of the desired text in unstructured text documents requires a multi-document review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Every text analysis initiates from the text pre-processing and mostly include the dictionary analysis. This step remains intact in many applications of natural language processing [4], [7], [11]. Assessing the existence of the desired text in unstructured text documents requires a multi-document review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the webpages and informal documents have keywords or page rank keywords to represent the actual text document's theme. TF-IDF and PRK generally help to assess the contents of relevant text documents [7], [16], [26]. However, for in-depth text assessments, multiple text processing techniques require systematically joined to relate text segments [9], [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The approach is evaluated on DUC2004 and BBC news datasets using evaluation metrics such as precision, recall and F1 score. Sanchez-Gomez et al [51] performs a comparative study of disparate criterions applicable for generic extractive summarization for multi-documents. In this, authors execute experiments on DUC datasets with all possible combinations of various criterions, namely Content Coverage, Redundancy Reduction, Relevance and Coherence.…”
Section: A Extractive Summarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%