2004
DOI: 10.1115/1.1596550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Analytical Investigations of the Dynamic Response of Adhesively Bonded Single Lap Joints

Abstract: Dynamic response of single lap joints, subjected to a harmonic peeling load is studied theoretically and experimentally. In the theoretical part, dynamic response of a single lap joint clamped at one end and subjected to a harmonic peeling load at the other end is investigated. Adherents are modeled as Euler-Bernouli beams joined in the lap area by a viscoelastic adhesive layer. Both axial and transverse deformations of adherents are considered in deriving the equations of motion. The effects of adhesive layer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the mechanical loss factor was not normalized as its value was not reported by the vendor. Nonetheless, various epoxy materials display a value of the mechanical loss factor in the range of 0.005–0.015 (Vaziri et al, 2004) which was chosen as the range of interest for the study. Figure 9(b) suggests that both the conductance, G ( ω ), and the absolute value of the impedance, | Y false( ω false) | , increase as the adhesive’s loss factor increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the mechanical loss factor was not normalized as its value was not reported by the vendor. Nonetheless, various epoxy materials display a value of the mechanical loss factor in the range of 0.005–0.015 (Vaziri et al, 2004) which was chosen as the range of interest for the study. Figure 9(b) suggests that both the conductance, G ( ω ), and the absolute value of the impedance, | Y false( ω false) | , increase as the adhesive’s loss factor increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the sensitivity of the method introduced in this article with respect to the sliding ratio, χ , is compared to the sensitivity of the reflection coefficient. In the past, various authors (Jiao and Rose, 1991; Nagy, 1991; Pilarski and Rose (1998); Vaziri et al, 2004) proposed using P- and SH-waves to infer the presence of a weak bond at the interface between the adherent and the adhesive. Since SH-waves were shown to be relatively more sensitive to weak interfaces, they were preferred as the method to compare the sensitivity of the technique proposed in this article.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, Q q is the shear force & M q (q ¼ 1, 2) the bending moment at the edge of the joint element, A ( ¼ w x t 1 ) is the cross sectional area of the beam, u 1 , u 2 , y 1 & y 2 are the longitudinal and transverse displacements of adherents; shear stress in the bonded area considering longitudinal and transverse displacement can be expressed as (Vaziri et al, 2004)…”
Section: Single Lap Adhesive Jointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation of motion was developed using Hamilton's principle. Vaziri et al (2004) developed a model to understand the effects of defects such as a void in the overlap on the system response. The paper by Lin and Tseng-Chung Ko (1997) deals with free vibration analyses of adhesively bonded plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural dynamic behavior of adhesive bonding has been the subject of extensive research (He, 2011). The effect of various adhesive parameters, such as material and geometric properties, on the structural dynamic behavior has been analyzed using analytic models (Vaziri et al., 2004) as well as very detailed FE models (He and Oyadiji, 2001; Kaya et al., 2004; Gunes et al., 2007; He, 2012a, 2014) including validations with experimental measurements of natural frequencies and frequency response functions (Aruleswaran et al., 2001; Vaziri et al., 2004; He, 2012b), mainly for simple beam or plate lap-joint configurations. The FE models used in these studies rely on very refined solid element meshes of the adhesive layer, implying mesh-dependent modeling and computationally expensive models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%