2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and analytical study on longitudinal joint opening of concrete segmental lining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction with the ground mass and the resulting behavior of the joints between neighboring segments govern the structural behavior of the lining. The mechanical behavior of the joints depends on their design, including the geometric layout of the initial segment‐to‐segment contact area and the use of bolts, connecting neighboring segments, either non‐prestressed or prestressed . The behavior of the joints is nontrivial, because of (1) nonlinearities resulting from bending‐induced partial segment‐from‐segment separation, (2) nonlinearities resulting from the material behavior, including crushing of concrete and yielding of the steel bolts, and (3) the time‐dependent viscoelastic material behavior of concrete .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interaction with the ground mass and the resulting behavior of the joints between neighboring segments govern the structural behavior of the lining. The mechanical behavior of the joints depends on their design, including the geometric layout of the initial segment‐to‐segment contact area and the use of bolts, connecting neighboring segments, either non‐prestressed or prestressed . The behavior of the joints is nontrivial, because of (1) nonlinearities resulting from bending‐induced partial segment‐from‐segment separation, (2) nonlinearities resulting from the material behavior, including crushing of concrete and yielding of the steel bolts, and (3) the time‐dependent viscoelastic material behavior of concrete .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical behavior of the joints depends on their design, including the geometric layout of the initial segment‐to‐segment contact area and the use of bolts, connecting neighboring segments, either non‐prestressed or prestressed . The behavior of the joints is nontrivial, because of (1) nonlinearities resulting from bending‐induced partial segment‐from‐segment separation, (2) nonlinearities resulting from the material behavior, including crushing of concrete and yielding of the steel bolts, and (3) the time‐dependent viscoelastic material behavior of concrete . The aim of the present paper is to consider all of these influence factors in the framework of analyzing a bearing‐capacity test of a segmental tunnel ring, without the need to explicitly model the nontrivial joint behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the duration of fire exposure had little effect on specimens' deformation behavior (at least up to 120 min). Joint opening is an important indicator of deformation in a shield tunnel and it is often investigated to assess a tunnel's safety [28]. Figure 16 presents the joint opening increment versus vertical loading data for all of the specimens.…”
Section: Load Test Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engineering practice and theoretical studies show that the section of a segment joint is used to maintain the balance of internal force and transfer forces, which is similar to the force-transferring property of reinforced concrete cross section [1].…”
Section: Establishment and Basic Idea Of Heb Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Shield technique has been widely applied in the construction of urban subway and underwater tunnels owing to its high level of mechanization, rapid construction, and minimal environmental impact [1,2]. e design of the segment structure is of critical importance for the application of shield technique and project construction, in terms of both the safety of tunnel structure and construction cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%