2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1777(03)00113-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and analytical technique for estimating interface thermal conductance in composite structural elements under simulated fire conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This model included a wide range of realistic and innovative considerations that have not been taken into account by other researchers. One of the novelties of the model presented here is the incorporation of the temperature dependent formulation of the interface thermal conductance proposed by Ghojel [8], which gives a very realistic prediction of the cross-sectional temperature field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model included a wide range of realistic and innovative considerations that have not been taken into account by other researchers. One of the novelties of the model presented here is the incorporation of the temperature dependent formulation of the interface thermal conductance proposed by Ghojel [8], which gives a very realistic prediction of the cross-sectional temperature field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst Ghojel's [23] thermal conductance model predicts the observed temperature differential gap for C-2-2-F-I-N, which is similar in scale to the tests upon which the gap conductance correlation is based, it does not necessarily reflect the gap conductance within CFS columns under all conditions (i.e. Equation 5 may not be applicable to sections where gaps do not form due to slow heating rates in protected sections).…”
Section: Capturing the Effects Of Air Gap Formationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It should be noted that the Eurocode guidance [4] assumes perfect contact between the steel tube and concrete core, despite the fact that previous furnace tests on CFS columns have shown the formation of a gap due to differential expansion between the steel tube and the infill concrete. No direct research has been performed to understand gap formation, although limited research has been undertaken to study its possible thermal effects [23], [24].…”
Section: Temperature Predictions In Unprotected Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the thermal resistance at the steel-concrete interface is expressed as t i /λ i where t i is the thickness of the putative interface layer between the steel and the in-filled concrete (assumed to be 2 mm) and λ i is the thermal conductivity of the interface layer. During the thermal analysis, the density and specific heat of the interface layer are ignored [43].…”
Section: Thermal and Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%