SAE Technical Paper Series 2008
DOI: 10.4271/2008-01-2997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and CFD Comparative Case Studies of Aerodynamics of Race Car Wings, Underbodies with Wheels, and Motorcycle Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To then experimentally validate the results obtained in the computational simulation [36], the deflector was mechanically designed and built (Phase III, Figure 2) to fit a 1:12 scale model car, which was also specifically designed and built (Figure 4). In the figure images, the model car appears with the deflector system already incorporated; however, In the design phase of the deflector in 3D software (Phase I, Figure 2), the upper deflector was designed in Autocad 3D ® .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To then experimentally validate the results obtained in the computational simulation [36], the deflector was mechanically designed and built (Phase III, Figure 2) to fit a 1:12 scale model car, which was also specifically designed and built (Figure 4). In the figure images, the model car appears with the deflector system already incorporated; however, In the design phase of the deflector in 3D software (Phase I, Figure 2), the upper deflector was designed in Autocad 3D ® .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To then experimentally validate the results obtained in the computational simulation [36], the deflector was mechanically designed and built (Phase III, Figure 2) to fit a 1:12 scale model car, which was also specifically designed and built (Figure 4). In the figure images, the model car appears with the deflector system already incorporated; however, In the aerodynamic simulations phase (Phase II, Figure 2), Autodesk Flow Design ® was used to perform different aerodynamic simulations, subjecting the vehicle without the deflector to the same aerodynamic conditions previously defined, and then the vehicle with the deflector designed in Phase I, to analyze the difference in the behavior of the airflow for both the conventional vehicle and vehicle with the deflector system incorporated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to stabilize the flow that is disturbed by car geometry. The size of the flow space is dependent on the size of the obstacle [2,4].…”
Section: The Wings Design By Cfd Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 With the deep research on optimizing body shapes to reduce the vehicle aerodynamic drag in decades, there is a little space improving the body optimization. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] So, the research on optimizing wheel structures to reduce the vehicle aerodynamic drag is increasing recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%