“…Therefore, the dissociation probability of the O–O bond of H 2 O 2 becomes higher in Pd-based catalysts compared to non-Pd-based catalysts and alloy Pd-based catalysts. On the other hand, H 2 O 2 adsorption energy ranges differ from −0.32 for Pd(111) and −0.36 eV for Pd(100), to −0.4 eV and −0.67 eV for different sites of Pd 12+12+7 cluster (B3LYP as the Hamiltonian and LANL2DZ as the basis), to −1.1 and −1.24 eV for H 0.33 MoO 3 (100) (B3LYP and 6-311++G(d,p) basis set), to −1.49 eV for (010)-2 B–Nb 2 O 5 , to −0.17, −0.18, −0.21, and −0.24 eV for Pd monomer, dimer, trimer, and pure Pd surrounded by Au atoms (GGA-PW91 approximation and PAW pseudopotentials), respectively. Therefore, poisoning of the catalyst surface by H 2 O 2 is less significant in alloy Pd-based catalysts as a result of lower adsorption energies.…”