2009
DOI: 10.4271/2009-01-0672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Computational Analysis of Different EGR Systems for a Common Rail Passenger Car Diesel Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the LP loop the increased EGR flow resulting from the opening of the LP EGR valve must pass through the compressor and the intercooler before reaching the intake manifold, whereas the HP EGR valve is located directly at the entrance of the intake manifold. This confirms results shown in [7] and [12]. Figure 7.…”
Section: Egr Valve Step Changes Involving a Single Egr Loopsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the LP loop the increased EGR flow resulting from the opening of the LP EGR valve must pass through the compressor and the intercooler before reaching the intake manifold, whereas the HP EGR valve is located directly at the entrance of the intake manifold. This confirms results shown in [7] and [12]. Figure 7.…”
Section: Egr Valve Step Changes Involving a Single Egr Loopsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…That study showed a delay in the change of EGR fraction with the addition of LP EGR due to the increased loop volume. Millo et al [12] also used GT Power to conduct step changes of EGR fraction with both the HP and LP EGR valves. In addition to the delay in the change of EGR fraction with LP EGR seen by Reifarth and Angstrom, Millo's simulation showed that the LP EGR loop reached the final EGR target more quickly during an increasing-step change in EGR fraction, illustrating a difference in the relationship between EGR rate and the turbocharger behavior for the two loops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental impact and energy demand of road vehicles have recently become more significant, justifying the great effort to develop technological solutions to limit pollutant emissions while reducing engine fuel consumption, according to the requirements of the recent European Commission Regulation on the carbon dioxide emissions for new registered passenger cars [1]. The goal of CO 2 reduction contributed (especially in Europe) to an increasing market share of automotive diesel engines thanks to the introduction of several technologies, such as fuel direct injection, turbocharging systems fitted with advanced control devices [2,3], electronically controlled fuel injection systems and new exhaust system layout [4][5][6], with particular reference to after-treatment devices. On the other side, the need to reduce CO 2 emissions to enhance fuel economy in automotive spark ignition engine led car manufacturers to introduce different advanced technologies to be jointly adopted [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other advanced engine technologies often cause, or even require, increased EBP. For example, EGR in diesel engines is frequently driven by elevating the EBP or by throttling the intake [24,25]. LTC requires very high EGR rates, significantly increasing the required EBP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%