2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2010.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and computational energetic study of two halogenated 2-acetylpyrrole derivatives: 2-Trichloroacetylpyrrole and 2-trifluoroacetylpyrrole

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The enthalpic increment for the insertion of a −COOH group in position 2 of the pyrrolidine ring is between −385.2 ± 2.4 kJ•mol −1 for L-proline and −388.5 ± 2.2 kJ•mol −1 for D-proline, as shown in Figure 3. This large enthalpic stabilization may be due to an intramolecular hydrogen bond, which was already reported for 2-acetylpyrrole, 55 2pyrrolecarboxylic acid, 56 2-trichloroacetylpyrrole and 2-trifluoroacetylpyrrole, 74 and 2-pyrrolecarboxaldehyde. 75 However, the stabilization is lower than that observed when a hydrogen atom is substituted by a −COOH group in the 2-position of pyrrole and 1-methylpyrrole (see Figure 3), which can be explained by a more favorable electronic delocalization in the aromatic rings, since the pyrrole ring is planar and the pyrrolidine ring is puckered.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The enthalpic increment for the insertion of a −COOH group in position 2 of the pyrrolidine ring is between −385.2 ± 2.4 kJ•mol −1 for L-proline and −388.5 ± 2.2 kJ•mol −1 for D-proline, as shown in Figure 3. This large enthalpic stabilization may be due to an intramolecular hydrogen bond, which was already reported for 2-acetylpyrrole, 55 2pyrrolecarboxylic acid, 56 2-trichloroacetylpyrrole and 2-trifluoroacetylpyrrole, 74 and 2-pyrrolecarboxaldehyde. 75 However, the stabilization is lower than that observed when a hydrogen atom is substituted by a −COOH group in the 2-position of pyrrole and 1-methylpyrrole (see Figure 3), which can be explained by a more favorable electronic delocalization in the aromatic rings, since the pyrrole ring is planar and the pyrrolidine ring is puckered.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For M2PC and E2PC, the N−H,O-syn is the most stable conformation adopted by both molecules, in agreement with studies from other researchers 56−59 as well as with other 2-pyrrole-substituted analogues. 40,41,45,49 The N−H,O-anti conformation is 4.4 and 4.2 kJ•mol −1 less stable than the N− H,O-syn, for M2PC and E2PC, respectively. For M2PC, this enthalpic difference is in perfect accordance with the values found by Dubis and Grabowski, determined at RHF/6-31G(d,p) and RHF/6-311++G(d,p) levels, 5.4 kJ•mol −1 , 57 and with the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) approach, 4.4 kJ•mol −1 .…”
Section: The Journal Of Physical Chemistry Amentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Following our studies on the thermodynamic and thermochemical properties of several substituted pyrroles and their relationship with the corresponding molecular structures, which are intended to be used as a building blocks of porphyrins, polypyrroles, and drugs with high therapeutical potential, we report, in the present work, an experimental and computational study on the energetic and structural properties of several alkyl pyrrolecarboxylates (alkyl = methyl or ethyl). It is of great importance for the understanding of the activity and behavior of large molecules to know the molecular energetics of its fragments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%