2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0001924000001950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and computational investigation into the use of co-flow fluidic thrust vectoring on a small gas turbine

Abstract: NOMENCLATURE AR aspect ratio c coanda surface height (m) H main nozzle height (m) l coanda surface length (m) L main nozzle width (m) m · air mass-flow rate (kg/sec) P a free stream pressure (Pascal) R coanda surface radius (m) t average secondary slot height (m) T thrust (N) α T thrust-vector angle (deg) θ collar cut-off angle (deg) CFD computational fluid dynamics FTV fluidic thrust vectoring ISA international standard atmosphere RCS radar cross section RPM revolution per minute SLS sea level standard a, p, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results for the effect of varying secondary gap height on thrust vectoring angle at constant Coanda surface radius shown in Figure 6-8 are in good agreement with the results of (the experimental and numerical work) of [14] shown in Figure 13, and with (the experimental and numerical work) of [12] shown in Figure 14.…”
Section: Verification Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The present results for the effect of varying secondary gap height on thrust vectoring angle at constant Coanda surface radius shown in Figure 6-8 are in good agreement with the results of (the experimental and numerical work) of [14] shown in Figure 13, and with (the experimental and numerical work) of [12] shown in Figure 14.…”
Section: Verification Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…All thrust vectoring techniques are evaluated with some common parameters such as: pitch thrust vector angle and thrust vectoring efficiency, which are important parameters to evaluate and compare the ability of different configurations to vector the primary exhaust flow with a given amount of secondary fluidic injection (Kowal, 2002;Flamm, 1996). The fluidic thrust vectoring techniques have been developed to include co-flow, counter-flow, shock vector control, throat skewing, and synthetic jet actuators (Jain et al, 2015;Banazadeh et al, 2008). All these vectoring techniques use secondary jet flows for thrust vectoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 and listed in Table 2, different nozzles including one rectangular and two circular sections have been built and experimentally tested to gather data for different secondary to primary mass flow ratios. To improve the validity of the results by increasing the number of data, other geometrically different nozzles have also been considered, some of which from a parallel investigation process on the nozzle geometry optimisation for the best thrust vectoring angle, and analysed computationally using a previously developed and validated CFD simulation models (15,19) . The validation of the models has been carried out by the use of the experimental test data of the already mentioned physically built nozzles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%