2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and finite element investigation of strengthened LSC bridge piers under Quasi-Static Cyclic Load Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of fiber and plastic makes the FRP high corrosion resistance and suitable for use in undersea structures [8]. The applications of FPRs are not limited to RC building members but are also extended to RC bridge piers, girders, and slabs to enhance their strength at ULS [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of fiber and plastic makes the FRP high corrosion resistance and suitable for use in undersea structures [8]. The applications of FPRs are not limited to RC building members but are also extended to RC bridge piers, girders, and slabs to enhance their strength at ULS [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found by the maintenance engineers that the strengthening of substructures is more difficult than that of superstructures because the substructures of a bridge include structures that lie under water most of the year, e.g., piles, piers, etc. Conventional strengthening methods for the substructure, such as enlarging section method [2], bonded steel plates method [3], fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) method [4,5,6], extraneous prestressed strengthening technique [7], and other novel methods [8,9], do improve the load capacity and durability of substructure. However, they are more often than not expensive, time-consuming, and traffic-disrupting, because cofferdam needs to be built for drainage first before any work could be done to underwater substructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, structures located underwater are more difficult to strengthen than superstructures. The existing strengthening methods [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ] for substructures are costly, traffic-disrupting, and have a long construction time. To deal with these weak points of conventional strengthening methods, the FRP underwater strengthening method [ 7 ], the jacket strengthening method [ 8 ], and the precast concrete segment assembly method [ 9 ] have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%