2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41541-020-00246-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and in silico evidence suggests vaccines are unlikely to be affected by D614G mutation in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein

Abstract: The ‘D614G’ mutation (Aspartate-to-Glycine change at position 614) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has been speculated to adversely affect the efficacy of most vaccines and countermeasures that target this glycoprotein, necessitating frequent vaccine matching. Virus neutralisation assays were performed using sera from ferrets which received two doses of the INO-4800 COVID-19 vaccine, and Australian virus isolates (VIC01, SA01 and VIC31) which either possess or lack this mutation but are otherwise comparable. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
74
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the hamster model, the D614G mutation significantly accelerated droplet transmission during the initial stages of infection [ 52 ], whilst in ferrets, it provided an advantage for viral replication and transmission but did not alter pathogenicity [ 53 ]. Cross-neutralization assays indicate that this mutation is not predicted to adversely impact vaccine efficacy [ 54 ]. Further work is needed to assess the impact of spike protein mutations on pathogenesis, host range and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 as well as on the host immune response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the hamster model, the D614G mutation significantly accelerated droplet transmission during the initial stages of infection [ 52 ], whilst in ferrets, it provided an advantage for viral replication and transmission but did not alter pathogenicity [ 53 ]. Cross-neutralization assays indicate that this mutation is not predicted to adversely impact vaccine efficacy [ 54 ]. Further work is needed to assess the impact of spike protein mutations on pathogenesis, host range and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 as well as on the host immune response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum samples used for neutralisation assays were generated and selected with the consent of the sponsor (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations), as previously described 8 . In brief, four male and four female ferrets received two doses of INO-4800 via intramuscular administration of 1 mg plasmid DNA to the caudal thigh muscle, followed by electroporation split across two sites using the CELLECTRA® device.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently investigated the neutralisation of SARS-CoV-2 isolates containing either the ‘D614’ or the ‘G614’ variation of the Spike protein, using serum samples from ferrets vaccinated with INO-4800, a leading DNA vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2 8,9 , demonstrating the D614G mutation was unlikely to affect vaccine-induced antibody-mediated virus neutralisation. Given the interest around the 501Y.V1 and 501Y.V2 variants, we decided to follow up our previous study by comparing neutralisation titres of INO-4800-vaccinated ferret samples against representative SARS-CoV-2 isolates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar neutralization or greater susceptibility of the S(G614) variant have been reproduced with live SARS-CoV-2 as well [ 47 , 48 ]. Several candidate vaccines have been evaluated in mouse, monkey, and ferret models and elicited antibodies with comparable neutralizing activity against S(D614) and S(G614) [ [79] , [80] , [81] ]. As underscored by these experimental data, single-residue mutations will not likely change viral sensitivity to neutralization unless they grossly alter S protein conformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%