2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and modelling analysis of seawater scrubbers for sulphur dioxide removal from flue-gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical SO 2 removal efficiency matches the experimental SO 2 removal efficiency generated at different gas and liquid flow rates and SO 2 concentrations in the gas phase. Figure 2 shows a comparison between theoretical and experimental SO2 absorption data obtained by Flagiello et al [9] via a seawater scrubbing process in a structured packed-bed column (D = 0.1 m; H = 0.892 m) with Sulzer Mellapak 250X. Theoretical SO2 removal efficiency matches the experimental SO2 removal efficiency generated at different gas and liquid flow rates and SO2 concentrations in the gas phase.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theoretical SO 2 removal efficiency matches the experimental SO 2 removal efficiency generated at different gas and liquid flow rates and SO 2 concentrations in the gas phase. Figure 2 shows a comparison between theoretical and experimental SO2 absorption data obtained by Flagiello et al [9] via a seawater scrubbing process in a structured packed-bed column (D = 0.1 m; H = 0.892 m) with Sulzer Mellapak 250X. Theoretical SO2 removal efficiency matches the experimental SO2 removal efficiency generated at different gas and liquid flow rates and SO2 concentrations in the gas phase.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The major advantage of performing with seawater includes the simultaneous elimination of NO x and SO 2 from exhaust gas, undemanding plant design, compact scrubber system, no chemicals and absence of solid by-products. Furthermore, in the case of open loop scrubbers the acidified effluent is discharged into the ocean after neutralization [9]. Additionally, seawater scrubbers working under pressure excludes the losing of marine engines power because of the backpressure (no need to compensate the backpressure as in the case of seawater scrubbers operated at atmospheric pressure).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, literature concerning the application of seawater desulphurization in ships is still limited, and most of the studies that have been recorded focus on the optimization of the operation parameters. Only a few papers can be found that target the optimization of scrubber structure parameters . Conventional scaling‐up and optimization methods through experiments are too costly; however, the CFD method can simplify and accelerate this process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few papers can be found that target the optimization of scrubber structure parameters. [17][18][19] Conventional scaling-up and optimization methods through experiments are too costly; however, the CFD method can simplify and accelerate this process. Recently, significant progress has been made in the FGD mathematical model that is based on CFD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%