2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and modelling studies on the effects of nanofluids (SiO2, Al2O3, and CuO) and surfactants (SDS and CTAB) on CH4 and CO2 clathrate hydrates formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the formation effect of hydrate will change accordingly. This was consistent with the observations of Pahlavanzadeh et al [38] and Partoon et al [39]. The minimum concentration of surfactant micelle formation is the critical micelle concentration (CMC).…”
Section: Macroscopic Experimentssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the formation effect of hydrate will change accordingly. This was consistent with the observations of Pahlavanzadeh et al [38] and Partoon et al [39]. The minimum concentration of surfactant micelle formation is the critical micelle concentration (CMC).…”
Section: Macroscopic Experimentssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, the 0.05 wt.% SDS concentration had the sh duction time, and the promotion effect of CO2 hydrate formation was the most As a result of the salt removal effect of hydrate growth, water in the solution w sumed for hydrate growth, which resulted in an increased concentration of SDS a NaCl is a thermodynamic inhibitor; therefore, a high concentration of SDS will als the formation of hydrates. Thus, the formation effect of hydrate will change acco This was consistent with the observations of Pahlavanzadeh et al [38] and Parto [39]. The minimum concentration of surfactant micelle formation is the critica concentration (CMC).…”
Section: Macroscopic Experimentssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They asserted that at low concentrations (0.1-0.2-0.3 wt.%), this additive acted as a kinetic promoter for the process. A similar trend was found in [32] with the addition of low concentrations of CuO (0.1-0.3-0.5 wt.%).…”
Section: Cusn12 Powdersupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Li et al (2006) suggested the SAFT in conjunction with the vdW-P to predict the behavior of single hydrates (C 1 -C 3 , and CO 2 ) in the presence of methanol and glycerol as hydrate inhibitors. However, CPA application for the vapor-liquid equilibria (VLE) (Folas et al 2006) and liquid-liquid equilibria (LLE) (Oliveira et al 2007) of natural gas hydrate composition has been investigated before 2007; Kontogeorgis et al (2007) were the first ones to combine CPA EoS with the vdW-P model and suggested reliable models for the phase behavior of water, alcohols, and natural gas components. Tavasoli et al (2016) investigated the influence of cyclic hydrocarbons (i.e., benzene and cyclohexane) on the methane and CO 2 hydrates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%