2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and natural evidence of SARS-CoV-2-infection-induced activation of type I interferon responses

Abstract: Highlights SARS-CoV-2 induces the expression of type I IFNs in human lung cells Moderate cases of COVID-19 have higher serum levels of IL-10 and IFNa Severe cases of COVID-19 have higher serum levels of IL-6, TNFa and IL-8 Physiological levels of IFNa reduces SARS-CoV-2 replication in human airway cells

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An unrelated set of 92 genes was differentially expressed at 12 hpi and 58 genes at 24 hpi. Genes induced at 24 hpi were preferentially involved with type I interferon production and signaling, consistent with a recent report (Banerjee et al, 2021b). Only minor changes to alternative splicing or APA during virus infection was observed (Supplemental Figure 7).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…An unrelated set of 92 genes was differentially expressed at 12 hpi and 58 genes at 24 hpi. Genes induced at 24 hpi were preferentially involved with type I interferon production and signaling, consistent with a recent report (Banerjee et al, 2021b). Only minor changes to alternative splicing or APA during virus infection was observed (Supplemental Figure 7).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Even with intense study, we do not yet appreciate precisely how SARS-CoV-2 infection causes severe COVID-19 in some patients and mild disease in others though a mismanaged or delayed IFN response and an overactive cytokine response is thought to underlie severe outcomes [65][66][67][68][69][70] . Despite some contrasting reports, [71][72][73], what is clear is that SARS-CoV-2 proteins use a multitude of mechanisms to outcompete cellular antiviral responses [68,[74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the study was not a longitudinal analysis and formal proof is still missing, the segregation of patient outcome by ISG-signature supports COVID-19 6 as a multi-step disease, which progresses from an ISG high to an ISG low pathology, acquiring peculiar immunological features during the transition. This pathobiology was confirmed in moderate vs severe COVID-19: a type I IFN signature, high amount of pSTAT-1 and 2 together with high expression of IL10 characterizes moderate illness, whereas severe disease is mainly defined by high expression of IL6, IL8, TNF, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), thus strengthening notion that there is a biologic transition from a high IFN phase to a relatively low IFN phase in which a broad inflammation prevails (46). It is still an open issue whether SARS-CoV-2 can be a mild (36,47) or potent (48) inducer of IFN responses; alternatively the host response might change over time as a consequence of adaptation to persisting immune stress.…”
Section: The Evolving Immune Landscapementioning
confidence: 76%