2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical analyses of unreinforced masonry wall components and building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Numerical and experimental analyses of a similar prototype was also carried out by Choudhury et al (2020) who presented two FE modelling approaches using concrete damage plasticity model and a two-step Fig. 2 Experimental test set-up of URM building (Shahzada et al 2012) homogenization model.…”
Section: Benchmark Masonry Building-case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. Numerical and experimental analyses of a similar prototype was also carried out by Choudhury et al (2020) who presented two FE modelling approaches using concrete damage plasticity model and a two-step Fig. 2 Experimental test set-up of URM building (Shahzada et al 2012) homogenization model.…”
Section: Benchmark Masonry Building-case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the studies on masonry buildings in developing countries such as India (Singh et al 2013;Sarkar et al 2015;Kadam et al 2020;Choudhury et al 2020), Nepal (Habieb et al 2018;Giordano et al 2020), Pakistan (Shahzada et al 2012) and Iran (Bhakshi and Karimi 2008) as available in the literature, the compressive strength ( f c ) of masonry varies from 2.0 MPa to 6.0 MPa, tensile strength varies from 0.04 f c to 0.12 f c , and shear strength varies from 0.02 f c to 0.07 f c . A wide variation is observed in the elastic modulus of the masonry in developing countries, ranging from 400 to 2200 MPa.…”
Section: Numerical Macro-modelling Options Selected In This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are (1) comparatively higher strength units and lower strength mortar, (2) comparatively higher strength mortar and lower strength units, (3) relatively low strength units and mortar and (4) comparatively higher strength units to relatively higher strength mortars. Subsequently, the mechanical characteristics of masonry made with diverse unit-to mortar combinations are different to each other, as their individual characteristics contribute to the overall compression behaviour of the masonry [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Thus, an appropriate analytical model should be able to predict the cyclic compression behaviour of different masonry assemblies.…”
Section: Experimental Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panto et al [7] numerically examined the masonry walls under the off-plane load using 3D discrete macro element models. Thainswemong et al [8] conducted a numerical and experimental study on a masonry wall. In the study, isotropic elastic damaging 3D modeling and two-step homogenized FEM was used to predict the fracture behavior of masonry wall, and the model was reasonably accurate compared to the experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%