2016
DOI: 10.11113/jt.v78.8530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Interaction Between Subsoil and Post-Ensioned Slab-on-Ground

Abstract: Graphical abstract AbstractThe paper presents the process of a static load test on post-tensioned concrete industrial floor model in the first part and a numerical model of this task in the second part. The experimental model was designed as a cutout of a post-tensioned concrete industrial floor and the static load test was conceived as a simulation by loading the base plate of a heavy rack. The described static load test was part of a series of experiments focused on the problematics of interaction between co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If tendons and prestressing force are sized well, it is possible to design relatively thin foundation, maintaining the same structure stiffness with the increased crack resistance, shear and push-through bearing capacity. Experimental tests also confirm a significant increase in resistance of prestressed foundation slabs [7], [8], [9], [10], compared with fiber concrete or reinforced concrete foundations [20], [21].…”
Section: Pre-stressed Foundation Structuresmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If tendons and prestressing force are sized well, it is possible to design relatively thin foundation, maintaining the same structure stiffness with the increased crack resistance, shear and push-through bearing capacity. Experimental tests also confirm a significant increase in resistance of prestressed foundation slabs [7], [8], [9], [10], compared with fiber concrete or reinforced concrete foundations [20], [21].…”
Section: Pre-stressed Foundation Structuresmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The prestressed structures rank among advance construction methods [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. If compared prestressed [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] with non-prestressed foundations [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] they offer also a number of advantages. Key benefits include thinner plate thicknesses, lower consumption of reinforcement, higher crack resistance, higher stiffness and push-through bearing capacity against upper structure columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bearing capacity of slabs G05 (25 kg of fibers per m 3 ), G06 (50 kg of fibers per m 3 ), and G07 (75 kg of fibers per m 3 ) corresponded to 478 kN, 550 kN, and 635 kN, respectively. This paper is primarily focused on the soil stress analysis below the slab, and additional detailed information relating to slab behavior during the mentioned experimental works have been explored in other papers [24][25][26]. The comparison of stresses below the three investigated slabs-G05, G06, and G07-related to the loading of 125 kN (before the slab uplift) is presented in Figure 9.…”
Section: Results Of Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aforementioned tests are performed on the steel frame test equipment (Figures 1 and 2) which is placed outside the premises of the Faculty of Civil Engineering in Ostrava (Czech Republic) (Cajka, 2014;Cajka et al, 2016a,b;Mynarcik et al, 2016;Buchta et al, 2016). The basic principle on this equipment is clear from Figures 1 and 2.…”
Section: Experimental Tests 21 Steel Test Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%