2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.105991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical evaluation of inelastic lateral-torsional buckling of I-section cantilevers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The test specimens had rotational angles that ranged from 7.42 to 17.98, with a maximum recorded of 11.77, a torsional angle that was deemed relatively high. [7] Yoshihiro Kimura, et.al (2021) studies based-on flange-web interaction, the I-beam cantilevers' elastic local buckle strength when subjected to shear force and bending moment. Local buckling is a type of loss in which the cross-sectional form of the beam is altered without causing a twist about its axis or a beam's change geometry, such as horizontal displacement.…”
Section: Figure 2 Lateral Torsional Buckling Test [7]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test specimens had rotational angles that ranged from 7.42 to 17.98, with a maximum recorded of 11.77, a torsional angle that was deemed relatively high. [7] Yoshihiro Kimura, et.al (2021) studies based-on flange-web interaction, the I-beam cantilevers' elastic local buckle strength when subjected to shear force and bending moment. Local buckling is a type of loss in which the cross-sectional form of the beam is altered without causing a twist about its axis or a beam's change geometry, such as horizontal displacement.…”
Section: Figure 2 Lateral Torsional Buckling Test [7]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the aforementioned beam FE modelling approach has been successfully employed in numerous previous investigations [10,11,13,45,57], in the present study, prior to being used to generate benchmark data, the approach is further validated against the results from 44 experiments reported in the literature [60][61][62][63][64][65], focusing on beams experiencing LTB. The loading configurations included (i) 3-point bending and 4-point bending [60], (ii) 3-point bending with eccentrically applied vertical loading, leading to additional torsion [61][62][63][64] and (iii) concentrated loading applied at the free-end of cantilever beams [65]. The boundary and loading conditions of the beam FE models were consistent with those employed in the tests.…”
Section: Validation Of Beam Fe Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shell FE models developed in this study were validated against the results from 59 experiments on beams experiencing LTB collected from the literature [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69]. The loading configurations included (i) 3-point bending and 4-point bending [62], (ii) concentrated loading applied at the free-end of cantilever beams [63,64] and (iii) 3-point bending with eccentrically applied vertical loading, leading to additional torsion [65][66][67][68][69]. The boundary and loading conditions employed in the tests were replicated in the FE models.…”
Section: Validation Of Shell Fe Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%