2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.107846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical exploration of defocusing in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) as an effective processing parameter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supplementary method 3) measurements were performed with similar beam sizes having an opposite defocusing position (positive and negative as divergent and convergent beams, respectively) and different laser intensity distribution. In conduction mode, the melt pool dimensions proved to be similar under identical laser processing parameters with a slight increase in melt pool depth and length in positive defocus, in agreement with previous observations 52,53 . Upon transition from conduction to keyhole, a signi cant difference in the melt pool length is observed with 45% higher values in RM2 compared to RM6.…”
Section: Operando Observation Of the Thermo-mechanical Instabilitiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Supplementary method 3) measurements were performed with similar beam sizes having an opposite defocusing position (positive and negative as divergent and convergent beams, respectively) and different laser intensity distribution. In conduction mode, the melt pool dimensions proved to be similar under identical laser processing parameters with a slight increase in melt pool depth and length in positive defocus, in agreement with previous observations 52,53 . Upon transition from conduction to keyhole, a signi cant difference in the melt pool length is observed with 45% higher values in RM2 compared to RM6.…”
Section: Operando Observation Of the Thermo-mechanical Instabilitiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…54 Importantly, the application of a zero-focus offset was pivotal in order to fabricate HSLs with the thinnest walls possible by LPBF. 55 After fabrication, the lattice specimens were cooled in the powder bed to room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers are implementing numerical simulations to study heat transfer and fluid flow during the SLM process across a variety of materials. They especially focus on single-track laser melting models, considering process parameters such as laser power, scanning speed, and layer thickness [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Additionally, some researchers extend their simulations to multi-track and multi-layer SLM processes to investigate further process parameters, including scanning patterns and hatch spacing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%