2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical investigation of narrow impingement cooling channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wall-jet flow in the channel interferes with the sidewalls causing a post-impingement flow to the impingement plate. The uplift moving of the flow causes therefore higher local heat transfer coefficients closer to the sidewalls of the channels, as shown in Figure 5(c), which is in agreement with Caggese et al 25 and Fechter et al 26 The surface contours show that the h/h max are increased at downstream channel positions, which means that crossflow enhances impingement plate heat transfer. However, the achievable heat transfer in the vicinity of the first jets, N j ¼ 1 and 2, is very low indicating small interaction with the post-impingement flow.…”
Section: Local and Spanwise Averaged Heat Transfer Distributionssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wall-jet flow in the channel interferes with the sidewalls causing a post-impingement flow to the impingement plate. The uplift moving of the flow causes therefore higher local heat transfer coefficients closer to the sidewalls of the channels, as shown in Figure 5(c), which is in agreement with Caggese et al 25 and Fechter et al 26 The surface contours show that the h/h max are increased at downstream channel positions, which means that crossflow enhances impingement plate heat transfer. However, the achievable heat transfer in the vicinity of the first jets, N j ¼ 1 and 2, is very low indicating small interaction with the post-impingement flow.…”
Section: Local and Spanwise Averaged Heat Transfer Distributionssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…25 and Fechter et al. 26 The surface contours show that the h / h max are increased at downstream channel positions, which means that crossflow enhances impingement plate heat transfer. However, the achievable heat transfer in the vicinity of the first jets, N j = 1 and 2, is very low indicating small interaction with the post-impingement flow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moffat [19,20] gave a description of errors' sources by using uncertainty in the planning of experiments. Besides that, Root-Sum-Square (RSS) method was used to predict the uncertainty by Caggese et al [21] and Fechter et al [22]. Table 2 shows errors and uncertainty levels of measured parameters in the calculation of effectiveness of porous plate, efficiency of the system and the Reynolds number.…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between flow topology and heat transfer has to be fully understood before optimizing the geometry of a multi-jet narrow impingement cavity. Although there are a few CFDoriented works for these kind of geometries (Fechter et al, 2013;Hossain et al, 2016Hossain et al, , 2018, they are mainly focused on the capabilities of the CFD models to accurately predict the wall imprint of transfer. The only purely experimental work that focused on the flow physics and its relation to convective transport was presented by Terzis (2016), who investigated mutual-jet interactions for a lowand a high-crossflow narrow impingement channel.…”
Section: Influence Of Flow Structures On Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%