2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Numerical Observations of the Frequency-Domain Method in Bender-Element Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial shear modulus G 0 is defined at an infinitesimally small shear strain, typically γ = 10 −6 , and can be measured in the laboratory using the BE and RC tests. According to the studies, the BE technique provides G 0 similar to that obtained with the RC technique (e.g., [10][11][12][13]). In addition, Sas et al [14] found that performing BE and RC tests separately may lead to a possible discrepancy in the determination of G 0 .…”
Section: Assessment Of Soil Stiffness At Small Strainsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The initial shear modulus G 0 is defined at an infinitesimally small shear strain, typically γ = 10 −6 , and can be measured in the laboratory using the BE and RC tests. According to the studies, the BE technique provides G 0 similar to that obtained with the RC technique (e.g., [10][11][12][13]). In addition, Sas et al [14] found that performing BE and RC tests separately may lead to a possible discrepancy in the determination of G 0 .…”
Section: Assessment Of Soil Stiffness At Small Strainsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…where ρ is the mass density of the soil sample. The strain level at which G max is determined from the BE tests is less than 10 (Viggiani and Atkinson 1995;Arulnathan et al 1998;Lee and Santamarina 2005;Greening et al 2003;Blewett et al 2000;Greening and Nash 2004;Viana Da Fonseca et al 2009, Camacho-Tauta et al 2016). Out of these, the most common and simplest method of estimating t s is to identify the time of first arrival of the output voltage signal and subtract from that the time at which the input voltage signal starts (Dyvik and Madshus 1985;Jamiolkowski et al 1995).…”
Section: Bender Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), which may cause the output signal to be considerably different from the input signal [7,8]. Four classes of interpretation techniques have been reported to date: (i) direct observation of the arrival time on the output signal [9]; (ii) cross-correlation of the input and output signals [10,11]; (iii) frequency domain methods [12]; and, (iv) model-based methods [7,13]. Direct observation and cross-correlation methods work with input signals compactly supported in time, typically harmonic pulses at resonant frequencies [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plot with the number of wavelengths as a function of the excitation frequency is used to find the travel time [15]. The method assumes that the transformation between input and output signals is only governed by the geomechanical properties of the material, which is generally not the case due to the distortion and reflection of the travelling waves, caused by the other constituents of the testing apparatus [12]. A model-updating method for the automatic calculation of the shear modulus was recently suggested in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%