2017
DOI: 10.1134/s1069351317040085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical simulation of the acquisition of chemical remanent magnetization and the Thellier procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
20
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As regards the crystallization CRM, the current blocking temperature T* must be replaced by the reaction temperature T CRM , so that the formula can be transformed into TRMCRM=TitalicCRMTbvvb which predicts a possible significant excess of TRM over CRM since the factor ( v / v b ) 1/2 is by definition greater than unity. This prediction is in a good agreement with the results of isothermal experiments modeling the creation of CRM on titanomagnetite‐bearing basalts during up to 200 hr at annealing temperatures T CRM from 350 to 500 °C (Draeger et al, ; Gribov et al, , ; Shcherbakov et al, ). These annealing experiments indeed revealed a rather strong (1.5–4 times) difference in the intensities of the created TRMs and CRMs, suggesting that the CRMs created in these experiments are likely crystallization CRMs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As regards the crystallization CRM, the current blocking temperature T* must be replaced by the reaction temperature T CRM , so that the formula can be transformed into TRMCRM=TitalicCRMTbvvb which predicts a possible significant excess of TRM over CRM since the factor ( v / v b ) 1/2 is by definition greater than unity. This prediction is in a good agreement with the results of isothermal experiments modeling the creation of CRM on titanomagnetite‐bearing basalts during up to 200 hr at annealing temperatures T CRM from 350 to 500 °C (Draeger et al, ; Gribov et al, , ; Shcherbakov et al, ). These annealing experiments indeed revealed a rather strong (1.5–4 times) difference in the intensities of the created TRMs and CRMs, suggesting that the CRMs created in these experiments are likely crystallization CRMs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…CRMs have been artificially created in laboratory experiments by isothermal annealing at T CRM = 350–500 °C of basaltic samples containing homogeneous TM grains (e.g., Draeger et al, ; Gribov et al, , ; Shcherbakov et al, ). In accordance with the predictions by Stacey and Banerjee (), these studies found that the CRM/TRM ratio was lower than one, leading to an underestimation of B anc by 20–80% in spite of unambiguous linear sections on the Arai‐Nagata diagrams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concave-up curvature in our gCRM Arai plots was also previously reported for models of gCRMs carried by non-and interacting systems (e.g., McClelland, 1996;Shcherbakov et al, 2017Shcherbakov et al, , 2021. The high-temperature linear segments of our gCRM and gCRM(T) Arai plots underestimating the paleointensity is consistent with results from Shcherbakov et al (2017); Shcherbakov and Sycheva (2019).…”
Section: Gcrm Contribution To Paleointensity Determinationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The lower thermal stability of gCRMs relative to TRMs is consistent with previous theoretical studies of non‐interacting and interacting assemblages (McClelland, 1996; Shcherbakov & Sycheva, 2019; Shcherbakov et al., 1996, 2017, 2021). In contrast to this study, Shcherbakov et al.…”
Section: Simulated Thermal Demagnetization Of Gcrmssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation