2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical studies of slurry-based coextrusion deposition of continuous carbon fiber micro-batteries to additively manufacture 3D structural battery composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the coextruded LiFePO 4 and CF with a solid polymer electrolyte in a micro‐battery showcases an elevated modulus of 124 GPa and a tensile strength of 1.1 GPa. This configuration yields an energy density of 77 Wh kg −1 at a current density of 0.5 C, holding promise for electric devices reliant on structural battery designs 90 . Notably, its tensile strength rivals that of commercial fiber‐reinforced polymer composites (CFRP: axial modulus: 155–400 GPa, axial tensile strength: 1.29–2.8 GPa) used for structural applications 92 .…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the coextruded LiFePO 4 and CF with a solid polymer electrolyte in a micro‐battery showcases an elevated modulus of 124 GPa and a tensile strength of 1.1 GPa. This configuration yields an energy density of 77 Wh kg −1 at a current density of 0.5 C, holding promise for electric devices reliant on structural battery designs 90 . Notably, its tensile strength rivals that of commercial fiber‐reinforced polymer composites (CFRP: axial modulus: 155–400 GPa, axial tensile strength: 1.29–2.8 GPa) used for structural applications 92 .…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This configuration yields an energy density of 77 Wh kg −1 at a current density of 0.5 C, holding promise for electric devices reliant on structural battery designs. 90 Notably, its tensile strength rivals that of commercial fiber-reinforced polymer composites (CFRP: axial modulus: 155-400 GPa, axial tensile strength: 1.29-2.8 GPa) used for structural applications. 92 However, a notable discrepancy arises in terms of elastic modulus.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages that 3D printing provides for battery fabrication include the ability to achieve high-resolution designs [60], ensuring mechanical stability [61], optimizing energy density and power density [61], customizing battery structures for specific applications [62], accommodating a wide range of battery sizes [63], having the fabrication processes with fewer steps and shorter production times [61], enabling rapid fabrication [64], the ability to create all-solid-state batteries [65], and the ability to fabricate and prototype the batteries with novel materials [60]. Moreover, 3D printing in the context of batteries minimizes material wastage, which is beneficial for environmental sustainability [66].…”
Section: Impact Of 3d Printing On Battery Performancementioning
confidence: 99%