2016
DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/58/7/074002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical study of error fields in the CNT stellarator

Abstract: Abstract. Sources of error fields were indirectly inferred in a stellarator by reconciling computed and numerical flux surfaces. Sources considered so far include the displacements and tilts of the four circular coils featured in the simple CNT stellarator. The flux surfaces were measured by means of an electron beam and fluorescent rod, and were computed by means of a Biot-Savart fieldline tracing code. If the ideal coil locations and orientations are used in the computation, agreement with measurements is po… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the Columbia Non-neutral Torus (CNT), Kremer [7] analyzed the volume of magnetic surfaces under hundreds of random coil displacements, including shifts and rotations of coils and he suggested the PF coils could be misplaced by a maximum distance of 1 cm while inter-linked (IL) coils could only be perturbed up to 2 mm. This was also observed later by Hammond et al [8] when the gradient of the rotational transform on the magnetic axis with respect to several defined rigid More recently, there are several new approaches proposed to address the challenge of tight coil tolerance for stellarators. A shape gradient method was developed by Landreman & Paul [15] to compute local coil tolerance after calculating all the derivatives of a figure of merit with respect to coil parameters.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…On the Columbia Non-neutral Torus (CNT), Kremer [7] analyzed the volume of magnetic surfaces under hundreds of random coil displacements, including shifts and rotations of coils and he suggested the PF coils could be misplaced by a maximum distance of 1 cm while inter-linked (IL) coils could only be perturbed up to 2 mm. This was also observed later by Hammond et al [8] when the gradient of the rotational transform on the magnetic axis with respect to several defined rigid More recently, there are several new approaches proposed to address the challenge of tight coil tolerance for stellarators. A shape gradient method was developed by Landreman & Paul [15] to compute local coil tolerance after calculating all the derivatives of a figure of merit with respect to coil parameters.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, it is known that CNT's coils have significant misalignments and exhibit field errors that break the two-field-period stellarator symmetry. 16 The principal effect of these errors was shown to be an offset of the rotational transform profiles associated with each setting of I IL /I P F . Hence, incorporating CNT's field errors is expected to result in an offset of the plots shown in Fig.…”
Section: Free-boundary and Stability Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The relative importance of the IL coils in this configuration is similar to previous observations for CNT configurations. In the paper of Hammond et al [13], it was concluded that the separation and tilt angle between circular, planar IL coils had the most dominant influence on ι -axis of the actual CNT stellarator. Kremer also suggested that the IL coils were less tolerable to displacements than the PF coils by comparing the Poincaré plots produced by misaligned coils [12].…”
Section: Eigenvalues Of the Hessian Matrix Used To Determine The Erromentioning
confidence: 99%