Experimental and numerical study of the spring-in of angled brackets manufactured using different resins and fiber textiles

Abstract

Process-induced distortion of composite structures often leads to a violation of tolerances, making the assembly of components difficult and expensive. It therefore can inhibit a cost-effective mass production of high-performance composite structures. Process-induced distortion is often introduced by curved regions of a part due to spring-in. Main drivers are chemical shrinkage of the resin and thermal expansion of both fiber and resin during cooling after demolding. Both contribute to residual strains and consequently lead to distortion of the manufactured part. The spring-in phenomenon has been already addressed in many studies. However, variations in manufacturing and specimen properties inhibit a detailed comparison of the results. Hence, it is difficult to isolate major influencing parameters. Here we show spring-in results of specimens that were manufactured using the very same experimental setup and laminate configuration but different resin and fiber types. It is therefore possible to identify the interaction of the curing temperature and the maximum achievable glass transition temperature of the individual resins as a major influencing factor. Furthermore, it is shown that the properties of the investigated resins do not differ largely in terms of thermal expansion and chemical shrinkage. Moreover, the latter was measured using two different techniques to enable a comparison. Numerical spring-in prediction revealed good accuracy throughout the investigated specimen configurations. Limitations found are the influence of the sewing of fiber textiles and the sensitivity of the model to gradual changes of the layup. Moreover, different homogenization techniques are compared with regard to spring-in prediction accuracy.

Characterization and modeling of an epoxy vitrimer based on disulfide exchange for wet filament winding applications

“…Compared to our previously published data for epoxy resins, the determined values yield consistent results since they are located in a range of 0.54–0.77 72,92,93 . Merely, the VR shows partly higher values.…”

“…Compared to our previously published data for epoxy resins, the determined values yield consistent results since they are located in a range of 0.54-0.77. 72,92,93 F I G U R E 2 Comparison of experimentally determined and modeled curing kinetics for epoxy resin (left) and vitrimeric resin (right) covering different isothermal curing temperatures.…”