2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.118219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical study of a compact inline swirler for gas–liquid separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It captures the key phenomena and trends observed in experiments, allowing researchers to understand the dominant mechanisms and identify critical factors affecting particle behavior. In the present study, we have considered the Luo and Svendsen model for both breakage and agglomeration, followed by previous works. In practical cases, sand particles can also form agglomerates when bitumen acts as a binder. However, in our CFD–PBM study presented here, we mainly focused on the bitumen residual distribution in the pipeline.…”
Section: Modeling Of Multiphase Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It captures the key phenomena and trends observed in experiments, allowing researchers to understand the dominant mechanisms and identify critical factors affecting particle behavior. In the present study, we have considered the Luo and Svendsen model for both breakage and agglomeration, followed by previous works. In practical cases, sand particles can also form agglomerates when bitumen acts as a binder. However, in our CFD–PBM study presented here, we mainly focused on the bitumen residual distribution in the pipeline.…”
Section: Modeling Of Multiphase Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no unified turbulence model to describe the turbulent characteristics of a gas−liquid mixture. Different turbulence models, such as the k−ε model, the renormalization group (RNG) k−ε model, the k−ω model, and the shear stress transport (SST) k−ω model have been evaluated for simulation of a swirling flow by Maluta et al, 56 Zhang et al, 57 and Putra et al 58 The results showed that the SST k−ω model shows better performance, compared to other turbulence models. This is due to its ability to accurately predict flow separation for adverse pressure gradient conditions.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle size of dust and droplets is very small, and they are sparsely distributed in space; however, the interaction between the particles should be taken into account. Therefore, the two fluid (TF) model (primary phase is the air and the secondary phase is the particle) is used to calculate the velocity field [ 24 ].…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%