2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical study on micro-blasting process of 3A dental implant titanium alloy: A comparison between finite element method and smoothed particle hydrodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the tool that moves into the materials reaches the failure state, the corresponding nodes and elements will be deleted from the main base body. The same has been added and highlighted in the revised manuscript [26,27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the tool that moves into the materials reaches the failure state, the corresponding nodes and elements will be deleted from the main base body. The same has been added and highlighted in the revised manuscript [26,27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle velocity and angles of impact are two main affecting parameters on erosion damage [1,49,67]. Thus, the characterization of the effects of these parameters on erosion rate is an important matter.…”
Section: Effects Of Particles Velocity and Angles Of Impact On Erosio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These small foreign particles, which generally have arbitrary angular shapes, move in a fluid, especially in the airjet for dry micro-blasting, consecutively strike solid targets and cause material degradation. This type of damage occurs on the surface of the components, called solid particle erosion (SPE) [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Khoddami et al analyzed the erosion rate during sandblasting of the surface of a dental implant made of Ti-6Al-4V alloy 33) . Their study aimed to compare two methods, FEM and SPH, in their model.…”
Section: Sandblasting To Implantmentioning
confidence: 99%