2019
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-211779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and quantitative imaging techniques in interstitial lung disease

Abstract: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a heterogeneous group of conditions, with a wide and complex variety of imaging features. Difficulty in monitoring, treating and exploring novel therapies for these conditions is in part due to the lack of robust, readily available biomarkers. Radiological studies are vital in the assessment and follow-up of ILD, but currently CT analysis in clinical practice is qualitative and therefore somewhat subjective. In this article, we report on the role of novel and quantitative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it remains difficult to accurately predict ILD evolution [ 15 17 ]. Tools and biomarkers must be developed to assess ILD activity and the predictors of ILD progression and treatment response to optimize the decision-making [ 18 , 19 ] in an era where, beyond immunosuppressants, new antifibrotic treatments, for example, nintedanib, are or will be available [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it remains difficult to accurately predict ILD evolution [ 15 17 ]. Tools and biomarkers must be developed to assess ILD activity and the predictors of ILD progression and treatment response to optimize the decision-making [ 18 , 19 ] in an era where, beyond immunosuppressants, new antifibrotic treatments, for example, nintedanib, are or will be available [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to CT and FDG PET-CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have the advantage of using non-ionizing radiation but has not been systematically evaluated for follow-up of interstitial lung disease ( 30 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that changes in FVC do not necessarily reflect response to antifibrotic treatment in individual patients. Change in disease extent quantified by automated interpretation of HRCT is being evaluated as a method of assessing disease progression, but is not established in clinical practice [51,54]. A quantitative lung fibrosis (QLF) score, derived from HRCT images, has been developed in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD) [55].…”
Section: When To Initiate Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%