2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and simulation study of the effect of surface functional groups decoration on CH4 and H2 storage capacity of microporous carbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The un-modified activated carbon sits just inside the bound (1.4,42,-23), while after modification with a urea/ethanol mixture, the material exceeded the bound (1.4,82,-24). [100] This paper also investigated oxidizing both of these samples with nitric acid to increase the concentration of oxygen functional groups; however, the oxidizing step reduced the capacity, placing the oxidized materials well within the bound (oxidized activated carbon (0.6,30,-15) and oxidized urea-modified activated carbon (0.7,71,-26)). [100] No metal-organic frameworks overcame the uptakeselectivity bound for CH 4 /H 2 separation.…”
Section: Breaking the Ch 4 /H 2 Uptake Versus Selectivity Upper Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The un-modified activated carbon sits just inside the bound (1.4,42,-23), while after modification with a urea/ethanol mixture, the material exceeded the bound (1.4,82,-24). [100] This paper also investigated oxidizing both of these samples with nitric acid to increase the concentration of oxygen functional groups; however, the oxidizing step reduced the capacity, placing the oxidized materials well within the bound (oxidized activated carbon (0.6,30,-15) and oxidized urea-modified activated carbon (0.7,71,-26)). [100] No metal-organic frameworks overcame the uptakeselectivity bound for CH 4 /H 2 separation.…”
Section: Breaking the Ch 4 /H 2 Uptake Versus Selectivity Upper Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Mirzaei et al studied the adsorption of methane in active carbons with/without surface functional groups by doping heteroatoms into the carbon framework, finding that the strong electronegative O atom in the functional groups repels the electronegative C atom in the CH 4 molecule. 10 Yu et al, 11 Han et al, 12 and Kang et al 13 also found that the types and proportions of surface groups are closely related to the methane adsorption capabilities in coals. Many stimulation approaches have been used by previous researchers to modify the molecular structures and methane adsorption performances of coals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al studied the effect of the chemical composition of coal on methane adsorption and found that nonpolar functional groups could promote CH 4 adsorption on the surface of coals; in contrast, polar oxygen-containing functional groups could weaken the CH 4 adsorption capacity . Mirzaei et al studied the adsorption of methane in active carbons with/without surface functional groups by doping heteroatoms into the carbon framework, finding that the strong electronegative O atom in the functional groups repels the electronegative C atom in the CH 4 molecule . Yu et al, Han et al, and Kang et al also found that the types and proportions of surface groups are closely related to the methane adsorption capabilities in coals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have long half‐life, high volatility and strong diffusion ability in water, which is extremely harmful to human health [2] . At present, solid adsorbents such as activated carbon, metal‐organic frameworks, silver‐based zeolites and so on, have been widely used as effective adsorbents in the fields of CO 2 , CH 4 , H 2 and I 2 capture due to the high porosity and light element frameworks [3–5] . However, poor water stability of most solid adsorbents and high cost impairs their CO 2 separation and iodine capture capability in practical applications and limits their wide application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] At present, solid adsorbents such as activated carbon, metalorganic frameworks, silver-based zeolites and so on, have been widely used as effective adsorbents in the fields of CO 2 , CH 4 , H 2 and I 2 capture due to the high porosity and light element frameworks. [3][4][5] However, poor water stability of most solid adsorbents and high cost impairs their CO 2 separation and iodine capture capability in practical applications and limits their wide application. Therefore, it is necessary to develop suitable adsorbents to tackle this issue of global importance in high demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%