2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and theoretical analyses of the age-dependent large-strain behavior of Sylgard 184 (10:1) silicone elastomer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples were subjected to a controlled tensile displacement of 0.1 mm s −1 until failure in a saline bath (NaCl, 154 mmol/L) at room temperature. Local (true) strains were determined from images of the deforming specimens (time lapse) via point tracking with a custom-written code [26] or similarly using an ImageJ plugin trackmate. Both 1st Piola-Kirchhoff (σ pK1 ) and Cauchy (σ C ) stresses were computed for each specimen according to the following relations: σ pK1 = F c /(w 0 t 0 ), and σ C = F c /(w c t c ), F being the measured force throughout the tensile test, w the specimen width, and t its thickness where the subscripts 0 and c refer to the initial (reference) and the current (deformed) configurations, respectively.…”
Section: Commercial Bioinksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were subjected to a controlled tensile displacement of 0.1 mm s −1 until failure in a saline bath (NaCl, 154 mmol/L) at room temperature. Local (true) strains were determined from images of the deforming specimens (time lapse) via point tracking with a custom-written code [26] or similarly using an ImageJ plugin trackmate. Both 1st Piola-Kirchhoff (σ pK1 ) and Cauchy (σ C ) stresses were computed for each specimen according to the following relations: σ pK1 = F c /(w 0 t 0 ), and σ C = F c /(w c t c ), F being the measured force throughout the tensile test, w the specimen width, and t its thickness where the subscripts 0 and c refer to the initial (reference) and the current (deformed) configurations, respectively.…”
Section: Commercial Bioinksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was adapted from ref. 52 and yielded membranes with an elastic modulus of 1.09 MPa53. The thickness h was verified by determining cross sections at 8 to 9 different, preselected points with a microscope in brightfield mode (LSM 5 Pascal, Carl Zeiss GmbH, Jena, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8-node biquadratic axisymmetric quadrilateral, hybrid, linear pressure, reduced integration elements were selected for all computations. The constitutive model applied for the PDMS membrane was the one determined in our previous investigations on the multiaxial large strain mechanical behavior of the material53. The membrane edge was constrained in the vertical and radial direction, to simulate the boundary conditions applied in the real system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element analysis (FEA) of arbitrary contact interactions with the sensor's soft surface requires material models that account for geometrical and material nonlinearities. Soft elastomers are often modeled as hyperelastic materials [26], and finding a suitable model formulation and corresponding parameters generally necessitates experimental data from both uniaxial and biaxial stress states [27], [28]. To this end, a large-strain multiaxial characterization of the two most compliant materials, the Ecoflex GEL and the Elastosil 25:1, is performed.…”
Section: Materials Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%