2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Theoretical Analysis Accounting for Differences of Pyrite and Chalcopyrite Oxidative Behaviors for Prospective Environmental and Bioleaching Applications

Abstract: The oxidative processes of pyrite (FeS 2 ) and chalcopyrite (CuFeS 2 ) of interest for bioleaching and/or bioremediation applications are evaluated in growing medium conditions to account for differences in their reactions mechanisms proposed with chemical and electrochemical analysis, and their electronic structures calculated with density functional theory (DFT). Electrochemical (chronoamperometry, cyclic voltammetry), spectroscopic (Raman, XPS) and microscopic techniques (SEM-EDS, AFM) are used to comprehen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to now, researchers have largely focused their attention on outer surface layers, while the underlying extended defective region could seriously affect surface processes in which the charge transport is important. We hypothesize, in particular, that such structures should take part in the inhibited anodic oxidation and oxidative leaching of pyrite, pyrrhotite and other metal sulfides [1][2][3][4][63][64][65][66]. Noteworthy, the above phenomena arise as a result of the sample handling in atmosphere, that is, in the early stages of metal sulfide oxidation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, researchers have largely focused their attention on outer surface layers, while the underlying extended defective region could seriously affect surface processes in which the charge transport is important. We hypothesize, in particular, that such structures should take part in the inhibited anodic oxidation and oxidative leaching of pyrite, pyrrhotite and other metal sulfides [1][2][3][4][63][64][65][66]. Noteworthy, the above phenomena arise as a result of the sample handling in atmosphere, that is, in the early stages of metal sulfide oxidation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10). It is currently accepted that the type, structure, and composition of surface sulfur compounds can influence SM reactivity (Cruz et al 2001a(Cruz et al , b, 2005Nava et al 2008;Murphy and Strongin 2009;Meléndez et al 2010;Lara et al 2015b). The presence of this type of surface sulfur compounds is identified in weathered samples by XPS (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S2). These current peaks are related to the oxidation and reduction during the dissolution of pyrite [39].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 98%