2024
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c00061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Theoretical Insights into Interfacial Properties of 2D Materials for Selective Water Transport Membranes: A Critical Review

Ashutosh Kumar Verma,
Bharat Bhushan Sharma

Abstract: Interfacial properties, such as wettability and friction, play critical roles in nanofluidics and desalination. Understanding the interfacial properties of two-dimensional (2D) materials is crucial in these applications due to the close interaction between liquids and the solid surface. The most important interfacial properties of a solid surface include the water contact angle, which quantifies the extent of interactions between the surface and water, and the water slip length, which determines how much faste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 236 publications
(295 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MD simulations offer a powerful tool for probing these properties on pristine surfaces, employing various force fields to model hBN–H 2 O and H 2 O–H 2 O interactions. , Studies using various H 2 O models, such as SPC/E, TIP4P, TIP4P/2005, and TIP4P/Ice, and different hBN–H 2 O interaction parameters have reported WCAs ranging from 0° to 115° on pristine hBN. ,,,,, However, inconsistencies arise due to limitations in the H 2 O model itself. The SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP4P/2005 model underestimates surface tension compared to experimental data, potentially impacting WCA accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MD simulations offer a powerful tool for probing these properties on pristine surfaces, employing various force fields to model hBN–H 2 O and H 2 O–H 2 O interactions. , Studies using various H 2 O models, such as SPC/E, TIP4P, TIP4P/2005, and TIP4P/Ice, and different hBN–H 2 O interaction parameters have reported WCAs ranging from 0° to 115° on pristine hBN. ,,,,, However, inconsistencies arise due to limitations in the H 2 O model itself. The SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP4P/2005 model underestimates surface tension compared to experimental data, potentially impacting WCA accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%