2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and theoretical investigation of ground state intramolecular proton transfer (GSIPT) in salicylideneaniline Schiff base derivatives in polar protic medium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there may be coexistence of these conformers in S 0 state. Hence, we believe that both tautomeric forms i. e., 1–3 (E) and 1–3 (K) would contribute to the absorption spectra. In addition, it is also suspected that the cyanide interacts with 1E via hydrogen bond formation (to form 2‐HB) followed by deprotonation process (to form 4D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, there may be coexistence of these conformers in S 0 state. Hence, we believe that both tautomeric forms i. e., 1–3 (E) and 1–3 (K) would contribute to the absorption spectra. In addition, it is also suspected that the cyanide interacts with 1E via hydrogen bond formation (to form 2‐HB) followed by deprotonation process (to form 4D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Absorption spectra of HBAP, in both these solvents, consist of two π–π* bands with maxima (λmaxabs) at 350 and 445 nm, ascribed to enol and keto forms, respectively (Figure 2A). 35 The fluorescence spectra are Stokes shifted, with emission maxima (λmaxem) at 540 nm in both the solvents (Figure 2A and Figure S3A). For both the Schiff bases, the fluorescence quantum yield is miniscule (ϕf = 0.001 in HBAP and 0.0002 for salbn) in methanol, but increases to ϕf = 0.008 in glycerol (Figure 2B), as segmental motions are hindered in the solvent with significantly higher viscosity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, in polar solvents it exhibits dual emission at around 365 nm and 500 nm which were ascribed to enol emission and keto emission respectively (figure S19) [28]. The transition from single emission to dual emission should be attributed to the solvation of the hydroxyl group in polar solvents, which partly break the intramolecular hydrogen bonds and thus disturb the ESIPT process [35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Emission In Solution Statementioning
confidence: 99%