“…A plausible explanation could be that the irregularly shaped Co 3 O 4 nanoparticles are randomly faceted, giving rise to the low percentage of active facets. Since the most stable and frequently exposed surfaces of FCC‐phase Co 3 O 4 nanomaterials are {111} facets, the Co 3 O 4 hexagonal platelets of exposed {111} facets becomes the best target to determine the crystal facet effect. β‐Co(OH) 2 precursors were then calcined under different temperatures including 200, 400, 600, and 800 °C, respectively, because high temperature is known to benefit growth of crystals of the most stable surfaces.…”