1996
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)00001-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and theoretical quantification of the development of damage in fatigue tests of bone and antler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study are in agreement with previous ones (Zioupos et al, 1996;Taylor et al, 2002). These studies examined cycles to failure vs. stress and damage vs. stress and showed that bone experiences mainly a loss in material stiffness and loss in strength.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the present study are in agreement with previous ones (Zioupos et al, 1996;Taylor et al, 2002). These studies examined cycles to failure vs. stress and damage vs. stress and showed that bone experiences mainly a loss in material stiffness and loss in strength.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The methods for fatigue analysis are most frequently based on the relation between deformations, stresses and number of loading cycles, and are usually modified to fit the nature of the stress cycle (Sobelman et al, 2004;Zioupos et al, 1996). The number of stress cycles required for a fatigue crack to appear can be determined iteratively with the strain-life method N − ε .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fatigue strength of bovine bone (27) in zerotension loading lies above the prediction line for human material by factors of 1.43 at 2 Hz (Fig. 3 ) and 1.44 at high frequencies (30-125 Hz) (Fig.…”
Section: Bovine and Equine Bone At Physiological Frequencymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Antler strength is hence crucial in withstanding the tension generated by both males without breaking, and in transferring the forces generated by the hind quarters to the opponent. In fact, antler bone has been shown to be up to three times more resistant than ordinary bone (Zioupos et al 1996), suggesting that this trait might have been under strong selective pressures. Stags with broken antlers have been shown to lose more combats and drop in the hierarchy (Espmark 1964;Lincoln et al 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%