2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(02)01319-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and theoretical study of the MgO/Ag() interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
30
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated equilibrium MgO-metal distance depends naturally on the substrate metal, and the choice of 7 the exchange correlation functional. While PBE and RPBE functionals tend to exaggerate the MgO-metal distance 52 , the inclusion of van der Waals interactions reduces the MgO-Ag distance to 2.5Å 52 , which is in line with experiments 49,50 . For a single MgO layer calculations give 0.2 (0.1)Å rumpling (either cations or anions are closer to the metal surface) on a Mo(Ag) support 42,48 but already in a bilayer system rumpling drops substantially being only 0.1Å for the Mo support.…”
Section: Preparation and Properties Of Modified Simple Oxidessupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated equilibrium MgO-metal distance depends naturally on the substrate metal, and the choice of 7 the exchange correlation functional. While PBE and RPBE functionals tend to exaggerate the MgO-metal distance 52 , the inclusion of van der Waals interactions reduces the MgO-Ag distance to 2.5Å 52 , which is in line with experiments 49,50 . For a single MgO layer calculations give 0.2 (0.1)Å rumpling (either cations or anions are closer to the metal surface) on a Mo(Ag) support 42,48 but already in a bilayer system rumpling drops substantially being only 0.1Å for the Mo support.…”
Section: Preparation and Properties Of Modified Simple Oxidessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This is seen in calculated MgO-metal distances, which are shorter for MgO-Mo than for MgO-Ag systems 28,48 . The existing experimental data indicates that MgO-Ag distance varies between 2.37Å and 2.53Å [49][50][51] . The calculated equilibrium MgO-metal distance depends naturally on the substrate metal, and the choice of 7 the exchange correlation functional.…”
Section: Preparation and Properties Of Modified Simple Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Also experiments confirm that the O-top site is the most stable adsorption site on Ag substrates. 30 This vertical displacement can here be responsible for the tilted MgO planes determined from the diffraction data and shown in the model ͓Fig. 8͑e͒, only Mg atoms are represented͔.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The interface distance MgO to Ag has been found to be 2.43± 0.02 by EXAFS, 32 2.53± 0.05 by GIXRD 14 and 2.39± 0.06 Å by LEED. 31 The latter authors also provide the values found in their calculations. They reported a distance of 2.39-2.55 Å for the monolayer and 2.46-2.55 Å for the bilayer with a second layer of atoms placed at 4.65 Å.…”
Section: A Geometry At the Interfacementioning
confidence: 86%