2020
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-020-1447-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and three-dimensional mesoscopic investigation of coral aggregate concrete under dynamic splitting-tensile loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the spalling test, the dynamic tensile strength can be evaluated from the free surface velocity [17]. Some concrete compression [14,16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and tension [10][11][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]…”
Section: Shpb Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the spalling test, the dynamic tensile strength can be evaluated from the free surface velocity [17]. Some concrete compression [14,16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and tension [10][11][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]…”
Section: Shpb Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They then proposed a revised quasi-static strain rate 0 of 1110 −6 s −1 , and a revised turning point of the DIF-curve to 1 s -1 , along with a modified DIF-relationship that achieves a better agreement with the test data. A collection of available SHPB tension tests data [10][11][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] is plotted in Fig. 5.…”
Section: The Tension Dif-curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of the number of coarse aggregates followed the classical grading curve of Fuller (Fuller and Thompson, 1907) with the given volume fraction. Then these coarse aggregates were randomly dispersed into the specimen domain with the extensively used “take and place” method (Ma et al., 2020) based on the Monte Carlo framework, which was conducted by a self-designed procedure FORTRAN. In actual concrete, a thin layer of ITZ with a non-uniform thickness of about 10∼50 µm wrapped the coarse aggregate (Grondin and Matallah, 2014; Thilakarathna et al., 2020).…”
Section: Meso-scale Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al [30] conducted dynamic impact loading tests using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system with a diameter of 100 mm, and the effects of strain rate on the uniaxial compressive strength, energy dissipation, fractal dimension, and failure morphology of SCAC were studied. Ma et al [20,31] proposed sisal-fiber-reinforced CASC (SFCASC) with a compressive strength of 77.3 MPa. Dynamic mechanical experiments were performed on the SFCASC by SHPB, and the SFCASC was found to exhibit an obvious strain rate effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%