2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental assessment and damage modelling of hybrid timber beam-to-steel column connections under cyclic loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of DIC systems in wood research spans material-level investigations (Iraola et al 2021;Jeong et al 2016;Kumpenza et al 2018;Matsuda et al 2019;Matsuda et al 2017;Totsuka et al 2022;Xavier et al 2012) to structural testing at the component level (Bakalarz et al 2023;Navaratnam et al 2020;Sirumbal-Zapata et al 2019;Timbolmas et al 2022). Within these studies, DIC is employed for a variety of purposes, including exploring damage mechanisms (Matsuda et al 2018;Matsuda et al 2017;Navaratnam et al 2020), determining mechanical properties such as Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio (Jeong et al 2016;Kumpenza et al 2018), and verifying the accuracy of finite-element analysis (FEA) (Sirumbal-Zapata et al 2019;Timbolmas et al 2022). Establishing methods to quantitatively evaluate the errors associated with DIC is essential for its effective adaptation to specific investigative needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of DIC systems in wood research spans material-level investigations (Iraola et al 2021;Jeong et al 2016;Kumpenza et al 2018;Matsuda et al 2019;Matsuda et al 2017;Totsuka et al 2022;Xavier et al 2012) to structural testing at the component level (Bakalarz et al 2023;Navaratnam et al 2020;Sirumbal-Zapata et al 2019;Timbolmas et al 2022). Within these studies, DIC is employed for a variety of purposes, including exploring damage mechanisms (Matsuda et al 2018;Matsuda et al 2017;Navaratnam et al 2020), determining mechanical properties such as Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio (Jeong et al 2016;Kumpenza et al 2018), and verifying the accuracy of finite-element analysis (FEA) (Sirumbal-Zapata et al 2019;Timbolmas et al 2022). Establishing methods to quantitatively evaluate the errors associated with DIC is essential for its effective adaptation to specific investigative needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the connection itself could dissipate the energy by introducing a steel component with reasonable ductile behaviour. Various types of connections that can dissipate seismic energy have been proposed, such as perforated plates [2], top and seat angle connections [3], wooden elements connected to steel stubs [4], Glulam post-to-beam connections reinforced by dowel-type fasteners [5], connections with three separate steel box sections [6], and prestressed timber beam-column connections [7]. Despite these solutions, the ideal type of connection for timber mass buildings would have replaceable sacrificial elements to reduce downtime and rehabilitation costs, as a lesson learned from the 2010-2011 Christchurch earthquake series [8].…”
Section: Introduction 567mentioning
confidence: 99%