2022
DOI: 10.1002/edn3.361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental assessment of downstream environmental DNA patterns under variable fish biomass and river discharge rates

Abstract: The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) (allochtonous DNA released by macroorganisms) which can be isolated from environmental samples such as water, sediment or even air (Bedwell & Goldberg, 2019), to detect and quantify the occurrence of organisms in the environment, developed spectacularly in the past decade (Bruce et al., 2021;

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have focused on the study of the eDNA dispersal distance, considering these different factors, in lotic environments, via experimental caged-species systems, field observation, and/or modeling (Baudry et al, 2023;Nukazawa et al, 2018;Van Driessche et al, 2022;Wacker et al, 2019). Certain trends seemed to converge, and to fit with our results (for the eDNA dispersal distance):…”
Section: Spatial Variationsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies have focused on the study of the eDNA dispersal distance, considering these different factors, in lotic environments, via experimental caged-species systems, field observation, and/or modeling (Baudry et al, 2023;Nukazawa et al, 2018;Van Driessche et al, 2022;Wacker et al, 2019). Certain trends seemed to converge, and to fit with our results (for the eDNA dispersal distance):…”
Section: Spatial Variationsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The interpretation of these spatial results is quite challenging to discuss because the detection distance is clearly dependent on many biotic, abiotic, and experimental factors, such as eDNA source depending on taxa/species and biomass, river hydrodynamics, decay rates depending on environmental factor like temperature and UV, volume filtered. Several studies have focused on the study of the eDNA dispersal distance, considering these different factors, in lotic environments, via experimental caged‐species systems, field observation, and/or modeling (Baudry et al, 2023; Nukazawa et al, 2018; Van Driessche et al, 2022; Wacker et al, 2019). Certain trends seemed to converge, and to fit with our results (for the eDNA dispersal distance): the eDNA quantity released at the source, correlated to the biomass of target individuals and their activity, including molting—for crustaceans—and breeding, has a positive influence on its downstream dispersion, with reliable detection up to 2 to 3 km, on different fish species (Baudry et al, 2023; Nukazawa et al, 2018; Van Driessche et al, 2022) and bivalves (Wacker et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, studies explicitly addressing how this method characterizes spatial patterns of aquatic taxa showed more limited distances [38,73,74]. For instance, a cage study showed that eDNA concentrations become strongly reduced 2 km downstream from the emission source [75]. In addition, eDNA provided fish inventories and species spatial patterns comparable to those of local samples using capture methods in the rivers sampled in this study [38], testifying for a local description of communities that does not exceed a few kilometres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%