“…The interpretation of these spatial results is quite challenging to discuss because the detection distance is clearly dependent on many biotic, abiotic, and experimental factors, such as eDNA source depending on taxa/species and biomass, river hydrodynamics, decay rates depending on environmental factor like temperature and UV, volume filtered. Several studies have focused on the study of the eDNA dispersal distance, considering these different factors, in lotic environments, via experimental caged‐species systems, field observation, and/or modeling (Baudry et al, 2023; Nukazawa et al, 2018; Van Driessche et al, 2022; Wacker et al, 2019). Certain trends seemed to converge, and to fit with our results (for the eDNA dispersal distance): the eDNA quantity released at the source, correlated to the biomass of target individuals and their activity, including molting—for crustaceans—and breeding, has a positive influence on its downstream dispersion, with reliable detection up to 2 to 3 km, on different fish species (Baudry et al, 2023; Nukazawa et al, 2018; Van Driessche et al, 2022) and bivalves (Wacker et al, 2019).…”