2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental assessment of energy absorption capability of carbon-epoxy and glass-epoxy composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase at smaller oblique angles is likely due to the increase in contact area and the resulting additional frictional energy dissipation. Ochelski and Gotowicki [21] studied the SEA of carbon and glass/epoxy tubes and cones at various inclination angles and observed a significant SEA reduction with increasing inclination angle ( Figure 5.18). The tests were conducted using quasi-static testing and it has to be expected that, during dynamic testing, structures might fail catastrophically due to an increase in peak load.…”
Section: Test Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase at smaller oblique angles is likely due to the increase in contact area and the resulting additional frictional energy dissipation. Ochelski and Gotowicki [21] studied the SEA of carbon and glass/epoxy tubes and cones at various inclination angles and observed a significant SEA reduction with increasing inclination angle ( Figure 5.18). The tests were conducted using quasi-static testing and it has to be expected that, during dynamic testing, structures might fail catastrophically due to an increase in peak load.…”
Section: Test Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At small angles of up to 10 • the load curve produced a decreasing slope until reaching a stable load, however the average crush load remained unchanged, [21]. Reproduced from Ref.…”
Section: Test Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results showed a dependency of the stability of the crushing response and the specific energy absorption on the loading, the geometry of specimen and the material composition. Ochelski and Gotowicki [45] performed an experimental assessment of energy absorption capability between CFRP and GFRP composites. The crush failure load and first peak load in the composite testing increases remarkably with the increase in the number of layers, content of fibres, composite thickness and bending stiffness.…”
Section: Composite Energy Absorbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy absorption capability is strongly dependent on the stacking sequence [1] [11]- [13]. Even when the same stacking sequence is adopted, the energy absorption capability changes depending on the cross-sectional features [1] [14]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%