Experimental assessment of new insulation coatings for lean burn spark-ignited engines

Abstract

Clean and highly efficient internal combustion engines will still be necessary in the future to meet the ambitious CO2 emissions reduction targets set for light-duty vehicles. The maximal efficiency of stoichiometric Spark-Ignited (SI) gasoline engines has been steadily increasing in recent years but remains limited by the important relative share of cooling losses. Low heat rejection engines using ceramic barrier coatings have been presented in the past but smart insulation coatings are gaining a renewed interest as a more promising way to further increase the engine maximal thermal efficiency. This article is highlighting some important effects of smart insulation coatings developed for lean-burn spark-ignited gasoline engines. Five different coatings with low heat conductivity and capacity are applied on aluminum engine parts with the atmospheric plasma spray technique and are tested with two different engines. The laser induced phosphorescence technique is firstly used in an optical single cylinder engine to quantify the thermal performance of these coatings in terms of temperature swing during combustion. A maximal increase in the piston surface temperature of around 100 °C is measured at low load, confirming thus the expected impact of the low heat conductivity and capacity, and suggesting thus a positive impact on fuel consumption. Thanks to the tests performed with a similar metal single cylinder engine, it is shown that the unburned hydrocarbon emissions can significantly increase by up to 25% if the open porosity on top of the coating is not properly sealed, while the surface roughness has no impact on these emissions. When applied on both the piston and the cylinder head, the optimized coating displays some distinct effects on the maximal heat release rate and NOx emissions, indicating that the thermal environment inside the combustion chamber is modified during combustion. Thanks to the temperature swing between cold and hot engine phases the volumetric efficiency can also be kept constant. However, no increase in efficiency can be measured with this optimized coating which suggests that the heat balance is not affected only by the reduction in the temperature differential between the walls and the gas.

A review of thermal barrier coatings for improvement in thermal efficiency of both gasoline and diesel reciprocating engines

“…A similar TBC study based on a direct injection gasoline engine 51 revealed another aspect of the surface structure, namely that increased piston surface roughness without TBC coatings does not cause an increase in unburned hydrocarbon emissions, while the open pores of a barrier coated material with the same surface roughness do cause a significant increase in unburned hydrocarbon emissions.…”

“…Chérel et al 51 investigated thermal barrier effects with five different coating strategies based on ceramics and polymer/quasi-crystal composites applied by an APS process, summarized in Table 3. The TBC was applied to the piston in cases A to D and to the piston and head in case E. The authors used a modern supercharged gasoline direct-injection (GDI) engine with 200 bar injection pressure, 14:1 compression ratio, and 2.4 tumble ratio.…”

Conjugate heat transfer study of the impact of ‘thermo-swing’ coatings on internal combustion engines heat losses

“…724084). 36 Finally, the results obtained with the coated engine are compared with those of the base aluminium engine in order to quantify the impact of the thermal insulation material.…”

Solving the Problem of Friction and Wear in Auxiliary Devices of Internal Combustion Engines on the Example of Reciprocating Air Compressor for Vehicles

“…The above cited problems are resolved by applying anti-friction coatings and composite materials [16][17][18].…”