2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental assessment of the energy performance of an advanced responsive multifunctional façade module

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The table 1 shows some results of this research. Last researches in the façades field have been oriented towards dynamic solutions [5], façades that incorporate renewable energy [6] or strategies to reduce the building energy demand [7]. TE technology use has been limited to fields where high-tech technology is needed.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The table 1 shows some results of this research. Last researches in the façades field have been oriented towards dynamic solutions [5], façades that incorporate renewable energy [6] or strategies to reduce the building energy demand [7]. TE technology use has been limited to fields where high-tech technology is needed.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, of the various energy efficient technologies considered by IEA-ECBCS Annex 44 activity [3], adaptive technologies embedded in the building envelopes are considered to have the largest potential to minimize the energy use in buildings. In particular, Double Skin Facades or Advanced Integrated Façades [5], switchable glazing [6], movable solar shading [7], wall integrated phase change materials [8], dynamic insulation [9] and multifunctional facades [10] are identified as the most promising adaptive façade systems and components in terms of energy reduction potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to other studies (e.g. [15]) this contribution evaluates the efficiency of façades using a multi-criteria approach combining energy performance and various environmental impacts. The results show that all 10 façade assemblies with TIMs have lower overall environmental impacts compared to a reference assembly with ETICS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%