2017 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/eucnc.2017.7980780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental-based propagation model for VLC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of real ITS implementations of VLC networks, one has anyhow to consider that the relative positions of vehicles and infrastructures is typically bound to road geometries and signaling infrastructures regulations (such as height and position on the road), and the ideal Line-of-Sight (LoS) condition where optical axes of TX and RX optical equipments coincide is far from being a valid approximation. In such realistic conditions the angular misalignment between TX and RX units can achieve large values, with strong implications on the quality of the VLC communication channel [27], as well as the achievable haul of the VLC link. Whilst a wealth of theoretical and experimental efforts have been made in recent years on development of VLC systems and protocols for ITS I2V and V2V scenarios [28], a detailed study of VLC setups in terms of optical performances is not avalable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of real ITS implementations of VLC networks, one has anyhow to consider that the relative positions of vehicles and infrastructures is typically bound to road geometries and signaling infrastructures regulations (such as height and position on the road), and the ideal Line-of-Sight (LoS) condition where optical axes of TX and RX optical equipments coincide is far from being a valid approximation. In such realistic conditions the angular misalignment between TX and RX units can achieve large values, with strong implications on the quality of the VLC communication channel [27], as well as the achievable haul of the VLC link. Whilst a wealth of theoretical and experimental efforts have been made in recent years on development of VLC systems and protocols for ITS I2V and V2V scenarios [28], a detailed study of VLC setups in terms of optical performances is not avalable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements and the subsequent analysis led us to develop an accurate propagation model as well as a performance evaluation [22,23]. Vehicular networks applications are envisioned to benefit of communication opportunity given by visible light [20,21]. Visible light communications (VLC) show advantages which are not inherent in RF-based technology, e.g., huge unlicensed spectrum, robustness versus jamming, and much less interference.…”
Section: Vlc For Vehicular Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of real ITS implementations of VLC networks, one has anyhow to consider that the relative positions of vehicles and infrastructures is typically bound to road geometries and signaling infrastructures regulations (such as height and position on the road), and the ideal LoS condition where optical axes of TX and RX optical equipments coincide is far from being a valid approximation. In such realistic conditions the angular misalignment between TX and RX units can achieve large values, with strong implications on the quality of the VLC communication channel [28], as well as the achievable haul of the VLC link. In this context, whilst a wealth of theoretical and experimental efforts have been made in recent years on development of VLC systems and protocols for ITS I2V and V2V scenarios [29], a detailed study of VLC setups in terms of optical performances, and in particular, the characterization of performances of a VLC link for different optics sets in terms of communication cast and effective Field of View of the system, would be of primary importance to assess the range of applicability of ITS protocols in realistic vehicular implementations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%