Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments 6 2005
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044544-1/50080-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental characterization and modelling of inflow conditions for a gas turbine swirl combustor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this method should be handled with caution. Its straightforward application to any RANS computation, but also to any LES, revealed some interesting anomalies associated with wrong sign of the axial mean velocity gradient, causing consequently a poor prediction of the turbulent stresses [39]. Pierce and Moin introduced additional forcing in the axial direction in order to overcome it [40].…”
Section: Inflow Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, this method should be handled with caution. Its straightforward application to any RANS computation, but also to any LES, revealed some interesting anomalies associated with wrong sign of the axial mean velocity gradient, causing consequently a poor prediction of the turbulent stresses [39]. Pierce and Moin introduced additional forcing in the axial direction in order to overcome it [40].…”
Section: Inflow Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Roback and Johnson [34], Monmont and Greenhalgh [28] and Palm [30]. Complementary computational studies using LES (Large-Eddy Simulation) and RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes) methods have been reported for instance in the studies of Pierce and Moin [32], Tang et al [36], Jester-Zürker et al [17] and Palm et al [31]. The experimental investigations of the can-combustor-like geometries exhibiting mixing of the swirled main flow and the radially injected air jets were the topic of the works of Koutmos [20], Heitor and Whitelaw [13] and Koutmos and McGuirk [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Gupta et al (1984) found that the swirl number must reach values larger than S > 0.6 for the vortex to break down and to develop a recirculation zone. Considering the results of Palm et al (2005) the high tangential velocities for larger swirl numbers cause a deceleration of the central mass flow which in turn promotes the occurrence of a free stagnation point downstream of a sudden expansion. The combination of swirl and the expansion creates a stable recirculation bubble, while the investigations also show that the swirl alone causes a recirculation already upstream of the expansion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%