2007
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental characterization, modeling and identification of the NEES‐UCSD shake table mechanical system

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper proposes a simple conceptual mathematical model for the mechanical components of the NEES-UCSD large high-performance outdoor shaking table and focuses on the identification of the parameters of the model by using an extensive set of experimental data. An identification approach based on the measured hysteresis response is used to determine the fundamental model parameters including the effective horizontal mass, effective horizontal stiffness of the table, and the coefficients of the classic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows photos of the NEES-Soft four-story test building built at the NEES@UCSD laboratory just prior to the installation of the CLT rocking walls. The shake table is a 7.6 m (25 ft) × 12.2 m (40 ft) outdoor uni-axial shake table with a maximum gravity payload of 20,000 kN (4496 kips); full details on the shake table performance and capabilities can be found in Ozcelik et al [25].…”
Section: Test Building Design Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 shows photos of the NEES-Soft four-story test building built at the NEES@UCSD laboratory just prior to the installation of the CLT rocking walls. The shake table is a 7.6 m (25 ft) × 12.2 m (40 ft) outdoor uni-axial shake table with a maximum gravity payload of 20,000 kN (4496 kips); full details on the shake table performance and capabilities can be found in Ozcelik et al [25].…”
Section: Test Building Design Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows photos of the NEES-Soft four-story test building built at the NEES@UCSD laboratory just prior to the installation of the CLT rocking walls. The shake table is a 7.6 m (25 ft) × 12.2 m (40 ft) outdoor uni-axial shake table with a maximum gravity payload of 20,000 kN (4496 kips); full details on the shake table performance and capabilities can be found in Ozcelik et al [25]. Although the exterior architecture was important for the aspect ratio and determining the locations and number of openings at the soft and other stories, there were several other features of this particular building era that had to be identified, such as interior wall density, room size, nail schedules, floor diaphragm, and flooring details, and of particular note is the lack of hardware such as metal straps and plates, which were not available in this era.…”
Section: Test Building Design Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) can be attributed to the dynamic interaction between the specimen and the table. More details on the mechanical and dynamic characteristics of the shake table can be found in Ozcelik et al (2008). The application of output-only system identification methods to these nominal white-noise base excitation test data would result in large estimation errors in the modal parameters, because of deviation of the input excitations from broadband signals.…”
Section: System Identification Of the Infilled Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated above, it depends on many factors such as the oil compressibility, oil leakage, servovalve dynamics, etc. [1,4] that can be obtained from formulations [4,6] or identifications as shown herein. In order to obtain the best fidelity of the achieved motion, a compensated drive motion can be applied.…”
Section: Shake Table Simulation Of Base Motion For Required Response mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, components of shake tables can be grouped into three sub-systems: mechanical, hydraulic, and electronic. Typically, platform and actuators are included in the mechanical category; pumps, accumulators, and servovalves are included in the hydraulic category; controller and feedback sensors are included in the electronic category [1]. 593 table.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%