2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2882644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Characterization of Millimeter-Wave Indoor Propagation Channels at 28 GHz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…after each measurement sweep. The measurements were conducted in a hall environment [49], which is a large room with few scattering objects. The floor plan as well as 20 Tx snapshots and major objects along with their corresponding PO models are depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Shf Band Channel Measurement and Po Object Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…after each measurement sweep. The measurements were conducted in a hall environment [49], which is a large room with few scattering objects. The floor plan as well as 20 Tx snapshots and major objects along with their corresponding PO models are depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Shf Band Channel Measurement and Po Object Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to meet the great requirements of wireless communication, mmWave communication has recently gained considerable interest in both academia and industry as a promising candidate in the future cellular network [1], [2]. Due to mmWave has the large band of spectrum resource with 30GHz to 300GHz, it can provide higher data rate in wireless communication and be widely applied in the communication fields such as radar, backhaul, satellite communications, wireless local area network (WLAN), and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the computational complexity of the proposed LrHPC algorithm is premised on the number of multiplications of several matrix operations. We can observe that the complexity of Algorithm 3 for the hybrid transmit precoder (since the hybrid receive combiner experiences the same complexity), is mainly due to steps 2, 4, 19 3 complex multiplications and the matrix inversion has a computational complexity of O (N RF t ) 3 . Therefore, this totally requires a computational complexity 3 .…”
Section: B Discussion On Computational Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%